Catharine Keene v. Penske Truck Leasing Co. LP. et al
| Catharine Keene |
| Penske Truck Leasing Co. LP., Lisa Taylor, Does 1 through 25, Inclusive, and Does 1 through 25, Inclusive |
| 2:2022cv08715 |
| November 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED PARTIES AND DISCLOSURE STATEMENT / CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Penske Truck Leasing Co. LP., (Lee, Madeleine) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Penske Truck Leasing Co. LP.. (Lee, Madeleine) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Barbara Superior Court - Cook Division, case number 22CV04084 with filing fee previously paid ($402 paid on 11/30/2022,, filed by Defendant Penske Truck Leasing Co. LP.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Answer to Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - All Other Documents Served, #4 Declaration of Jennifer Diercksmeier, #5 Declaration of Lisa Taylor, #6 Declaration of Madeleine K. Lee) (Attorney Madeleine King Lee added to party Penske Truck Leasing Co. LP.(pty:dft))(Lee, Madeleine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
