Alberto Munoz et al v. Nissan North America, Inc.
| Alberto G. Munoz and Michstica G. Mojarro |
| Nissan North America, Inc. |
| 2:2022cv08732 |
| December 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Sherilyn Peace Garnett |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Alka Sagar |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. #1 CV11C) (jtil). |
| Filing 4 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Michstica G. Mojarro, Alberto G. Munoz, (Jacobson, Kevin) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Michstica G. Mojarro, Alberto G. Munoz. (Jacobson, Kevin) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff Michstica G. Mojarro, Alberto G. Munoz. (Jacobson, Kevin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34408008 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Alberto G. Munoz, Michstica G. Mojarro. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Kevin Y Jacobson added to party Michstica G. Mojarro(pty:pla), Attorney Kevin Y Jacobson added to party Alberto G. Munoz(pty:pla))(Jacobson, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
