Gregory Gray v. County of Los Angeles et al
| Gregory Gray |
| County of Los Angeles and Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority |
| 2:2022cv08748 |
| December 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| James V Selna |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Fair Housing Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION ON NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL by Judge David O. Carter, re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of an Action (Pursuant to FRCP 41a(1)) #10 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (twdb)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Gregory Gray. Dismissal is Without Prejudice. (Gill, Faisal) |
| Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kdu) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge James V. Selna. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge James V. Selna to Judge David O. Carter for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-08748-DOC-MAR. (eva)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Emergency EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to Prohibiting Removal of Plaintiff from LA Grand Hotel on 12/5/2022 #2 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed document was not submitted or was not submitted as a separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (sh) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (sh) |
| Filing 2 Emergency EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to Prohibiting Removal of Plaintiff from LA Grand Hotel on 12/5/2022 filed by Plaintiff Gregory Gray. Ex Parte Application set for hearing on 12/2/2022 at 02:00 PM before Judge Unassigned. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration) (Gill, Faisal) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34413030 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Gregory Gray. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2) (Attorney Faisal M Gill added to party Gregory Gray(pty:bkmov))(Gill, Faisal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
