Prepared Food Photos, Inc. v. Port Town Foods, LLC
| Prepared Food Photos, Inc. and Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc. |
| Port Town Foods, LLC |
| 2:2022cv08761 |
| December 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Port Town Foods, LLC answer now due 2/6/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Port Town Foods, LLC.(Attorney Andrew Scott Green added to party Port Town Foods, LLC(pty:dft))(Green, Andrew) |
| Filing 12 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Prepared Food Photos, Inc.. (Radcliffe, Scott) |
| Filing 11 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (es) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Prepared Food Photos, Inc., upon Defendant Port Town Foods, LLC served on 12/19/2022, answer due 1/9/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jane Doe (Name withheld) Employee Authorized to Accept in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Radcliffe, Scott) |
| Filing 9 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Prepared Food Photos, Inc.. (Radcliffe, Scott) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Prepared Food Photos, Inc., (Radcliffe, Scott) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE: Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements. Counsel shall file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 form with the Clerk within 10 days. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Port Town Foods, LLC. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (Attachments: #1 CV11C) (jtil) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Prepared Food Photos, Inc.. (Radcliffe, Scott) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Prepared Food Photos, Inc.. (Radcliffe, Scott) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34415657 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Prepared Food Photos, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney Scott Edward Radcliffe added to party Prepared Food Photos, Inc.(pty:pla))(Radcliffe, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
