Nike Inc. v. Gnarcotic LLC
Plaintiff: Nike Inc.
Defendant: Gnarcotic LLC
Case Number: 2:2022cv08765
Filed: December 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Ronald SW Lew
Referring Judge: Alexander F MacKinnon
2 Judge: Alka Sagar
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2023 Filing 16 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: #1 Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction) (gk)
January 5, 2023 Filing 15 CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION AS TO GNARCOTIC LLC by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: Upon Joint Motion #11 , IT IS ORDERED that judgment is entered against Defendant Gnarcotic LLC on all of Plaintiff Nike, Inc.'s counts in the Complaint because Gnarcotic infringed the Asserted Marks. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Gnarcotic LLC, and its affiliates, officers, agents, employees, attorneys, and all other persons acting in concert with Gnarcotic LLC, are hereby permanently enjoined re Infringing Products, etc. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order terminates all claims asserted by Nike, Inc. against Gnarcotic LLC in this action, it terminates all proceedings in this action, and all future dates are stricken. See document for further details. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (gk)
December 20, 2022 Filing 14 SCHEDULING NOTICE (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The hearing on the JOINT NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction #11 , set for 12/27/2022, at 10:00 AM, is hereby vacated and taken OFF CALENDAR. The motion is suitable for decision without oral argument and stands SUBMITTED. No appearance necessary on 12/27/2022. The Courts ruling will issue. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cj) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
December 12, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar to Judge Ronald S.W. Lew for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:22-cv-08765 RSWL(AFMx). (rn)
December 12, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Filed Document RE: Joint NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or untimely. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (et)
December 9, 2022 Filing 11 Joint NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction filed by plaintiff Nike Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 12/27/2022 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (Attachments: #1 PROPOSED Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction) (Gershoni, Michael)
December 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE (In Chambers) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar under the Civil Consent Pilot Project. The parties are reminded to review the time requirements for consent set forth in the Notice to Counsel that was issued at the time of the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff is instructed to forthwith serve a copy of this Order on all parties that have already been served with the summons and complaint, or to serve all parties with a copy of this Order at the time of service of the summons and complaint. (hr)
December 2, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Michael J. Harris on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et)
December 2, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Christopher J. Renk on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et)
December 2, 2022 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Gnarcotic LLC. (et)
December 2, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (Attachments: #1 CV11C Statement of Consent) (et)
December 2, 2022 Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff Nike Inc.. (Gershoni, Bridgette)
December 2, 2022 Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Nike Inc.. (Gershoni, Bridgette)
December 2, 2022 Filing 3 Notice of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Nike Inc.. (Gershoni, Bridgette)
December 2, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Nike Inc.. (Gershoni, Bridgette)
December 2, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34416824 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Nike Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5) (Attorney Bridgette Gershoni added to party Nike Inc.(pty:pla))(Gershoni, Bridgette)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nike Inc. v. Gnarcotic LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nike Inc.
Represented By: Bridgette Gershoni
Represented By: Michael Joshua Gershoni
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gnarcotic LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?