Elizabeth Thomas v. BV Lakewood Carson SE LLC
| Elizabeth Thomas, Jesse Manuel Ortiz and Jr Bruce Kolacki |
| BV Lakewood Carson SE LLC and The Art of Development |
| 2:2022cv08833 |
| December 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alka Sagar |
| Fred W Slaughter |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for Showing Plaintiff(s) were Compliant with Filing Amended Complaint before the Deadline, Default Judgment on Defendants Should Be Granted, Request to Re-Open Case; Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Declaration of Elizabeth Thomas in support of Application filed by plaintiff Elizabeth Thomas. (jp) |
Filing 21
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: The court finds dismissal of this action is warranted considering the totality of the relevant factors. Therefore, the court DISMISSES this action without prejudice as to any action filed in state court. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) See document for further information. (jp)
|
|
Filing 20
MINUTE ORDER RE: RECENT FILING FROM PLAINTIFF #19 by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: The court also observes the Letter does not sufficiently request relief beyond that stated in the previously-dismissed complaints. (See generally Letter.) Accordingly, the court takes no action on the Letter. See document for further information. (jp)
|
| Filing 19 Letter from Elizabeth Thomas. (jp) |
| Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Elizabeth Thomas, Jesse Manuel Ortiz, Bruce Kolacki, upon Civil-Process Clerk, U.S. Attorney's Office for the Central District of California Federal Building, Attorney General of the United States - U.S. Department of Justice in Washington, DC served on 1/3/2023, answer due 3/6/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Not indicated. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Not indicated. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with statute not specified. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (jp) |
| Filing 17 RETURN RECEIPT OF CERTIFIED MAIL showing delivery of Unknown upon 450 Pennsylvania, received by Not indicated on Not indicated. (jp) |
|
Filing 15
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #3 AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915 #14 by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. The court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiffs Application to Proceed IFP (Dkt. 3), and DISMISSES WITH LEAVE TO AMEND the Amended Complaint (Dkt. 14) under 28 U.S.C. 1915s mandatory screening requirement. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm)
|
| Filing 16 Exchange and Submission of Evidence filed by Cadence Capital Investments LLC. (rolm) |
| Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants BV Lakewood Carson SE LLC, The Art of Development amending Complaint - (Discovery) #1 , filed by plaintiffs Elizabeth Thomas, Jesse Ortiz, Bruce Kolacki. (jp) |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Elizabeth Thomas, (rolm) |
| Filing 12 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Elizabeth Thomas. (rolm) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application #10 by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (See document for further information). (jp)
|
| Filing 10 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Motion to Dismiss Judgment in Case 22NWCV00168; Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Declaration in support of Ex Parte Application filed by plaintiff Elizabeth Thomas. (jp) |
| Filing 9 Receipt filed by Plaintiff Elizabeth Thomas. (jp) |
|
Filing 8
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION #1 AND POSTPONING RULING ON REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #3 by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. The court DISMISSES the Complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). The courts dismissal is without prejudice as to Plaintiff raising such claims in state court. To the extent Plaintiff wishes to file an amended complaint remedying the Complaints jurisdictional defects, Plaintiff must file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. See Moss v. U.S. Secret Serv., 572 F.3d 962, 972 (9th Cir. 2009); 28 U.S.C. 1653. If Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint by the applicable deadline, the Application and this case shall be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm)
|
|
Filing 7
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Elizabeth Thomas. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Filed Document RE: Complaint - (Discovery), #1 . The following error(s) was/were found: Document lacks required signature. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant BV Lakewood Carson SE LLC. Case assigned to Judge Fred W. Slaughter for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar., filed by plaintiff Elizabeth Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
