John Mallett v. Kilolo Kijakazi
| John Mallett |
| Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 2:2022cv08867 |
| December 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE by Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi, re Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) #15 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant shall have a first extension of 30 days to serve the Certified Administrative Record, until March 8, 2023. (es)
|
| Filing 15 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Kilolo Kijakazi answer now due 3/8/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Marriott, Michael) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi for all further proceedings. Please use the case number CV22-8867 MAR on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
| Filing 13 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (Attorney Michael K Marriott added to party Kilolo Kijakazi(pty:dft))(Marriott, Michael) |
| Filing 12 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: Request to issue summons is denied pursuant to FRCP Supplemental Rule 3. The plaintiff need not serve a summons and complaint under Civil Rule 4. re Summons Request #5 THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ev) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff John Mallett. (Benavides, Francesco) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL by Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi: re: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . See document for details. (es)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) #6 by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: The Request is GRANTED. (rolm)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and referred to Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (sh) |
| Filing 7 Notice of Errata filed by Plaintiff John Mallett. (Benavides, Francesco) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff John Mallett. (Benavides, Francesco) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff John Mallett. (Benavides, Francesco) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff John Mallett, (Benavides, Francesco) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff John Mallett. (Benavides, Francesco) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed as CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff John Mallett. (Benavides, Francesco) Modified on 12/8/2022 (sh). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff John Mallett. (Attorney Francesco P Benavides added to party John Mallett(pty:pla))(Benavides, Francesco) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
