Jesse Cantu v. Vimeo.com, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Jesse Cantu
Defendant: Vimeo.com, Inc., DOES 1 through 25, and Does 1 through 25
Case Number: 2:2022cv08888
Filed: December 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles F Eick
Referring Judge: Stephen V Wilson
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 18 IN CHAMBERS ORDER/TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: In light of the stipulation #17 extending the response to the complaint to 2/9/2023, the stipulation filed on 1/6/23, at Dkt. #14, is deemed moot. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
January 10, 2023 Filing 17 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Vimeo.com, Inc. answer now due 2/9/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Vimeo.com, Inc..(Wong, Kyle)
January 6, 2023 Filing 16 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Shane K. Rogers to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Vimeo.com, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34576976) filed by Defendant Vimeo.com, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Brody, Peter)
January 6, 2023 Filing 15 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Tiana A. Demas to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Vimeo.com, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34576902) filed by Defendant Vimeo.com, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Brody, Peter)
January 6, 2023 Filing 14 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to March 13, 2023 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Vimeo.com, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Kyle C. Wong, #2 Proposed Order)(Wong, Kyle)
January 6, 2023 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Peter Jacob Brody on behalf of Defendant Vimeo.com, Inc. (Attorney Peter Jacob Brody added to party Vimeo.com, Inc.(pty:dft))(Brody, Peter)
January 6, 2023 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Kyle Wong on behalf of Defendant Vimeo.com, Inc. (Attorney Kyle Wong added to party Vimeo.com, Inc.(pty:dft))(Wong, Kyle)
January 6, 2023 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Michelle C Doolin on behalf of Defendant Vimeo.com, Inc. (Attorney Michelle C Doolin added to party Vimeo.com, Inc.(pty:dft))(Doolin, Michelle)
January 1, 2023 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jesse Cantu, upon Defendant Vimeo.com, Inc. served on 12/20/2022, answer due 1/10/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Vincencza Cipriano, at CT Corporation System, who is designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of Vimeo.com, Inc., a Delaware corporation in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Ferrell, Scott)
December 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (dbe)
December 9, 2022 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Vimeo.com, Inc.. (sh)
December 9, 2022 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh)
December 9, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh)
December 9, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (sh)
December 8, 2022 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Jesse Cantu. (Ferrell, Scott)
December 8, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jesse Cantu, (Ferrell, Scott)
December 8, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jesse Cantu. (Ferrell, Scott)
December 8, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34442514 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Jesse Cantu. (Attorney Scott J Ferrell added to party Jesse Cantu(pty:pla))(Ferrell, Scott)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jesse Cantu v. Vimeo.com, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jesse Cantu
Represented By: Scott J Ferrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vimeo.com, Inc.
Represented By: Michelle C Doolin
Represented By: Kyle Wong
Represented By: Peter Jacob Brody
Represented By: Shane K. Rogers
Represented By: Tiana A. Demas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 through 25,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 25
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?