Camden USA, Inc. v. Wardell Wood
| Camden USA, Inc. doing business as Camden Harbor View |
| Wardell Wood |
| 2:2022cv08903 |
| December 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Otis D Wright |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court,Long Beach, No.22LBCV00642. (lc) |
Filing 7
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) #2 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court has reviewed the Request to Proceed In Parma Pauperis and the documents submitted with it. On the question of indigency, the Court finds that the party who filed the Request: has not submitted enough information for the Court to tell if the filer is able to pay the filing fees. This is what is missing: The Court lacks sufficient information to determine if Defendant is able to pay the filing fees. However, the Court need not make this determination because, as indicated below, the Court DENIES the Request due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. This case is REMANDED to state court as explained in the attached statement. Case remanded to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Long Beach, No. 22LBCV00642. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated.) (lc)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Wardell Wood. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, filed by defendant Wardell Wood. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the State of California for County of Los Angeles, case number 22LBCV00642 with CONFORMED FILED copy of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge Otis D. Wright, II, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Pedro V Castillo., filed by defendant Wardell Wood. (Attachments: #1 CV-71) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Camden USA, Inc. v. Wardell Wood | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Camden USA, Inc. doing business as Camden Harbor View | |
| Represented By: | Chris J Evans |
| Represented By: | Melissa Maria Hernandez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wardell Wood | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
