Rita Yegoryan v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
Rita Yegoryan |
Toyota Motor Credit Corporation |
2:2022cv08917 |
December 9, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Percy Anderson |
Alexander F MacKinnon |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 Receipt of LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL-REMAND TO SUPERIOR COURT. (aco) |
Filing 18 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. (aco) |
Filing 17 MINUTES OF STATUS CONFERENCE held before Judge Percy Anderson. At the status conference, Plaintiff declined to waive this procedural defect and moved to remand the action to the Los Angeles Superior Court based on the defect in Defendants Notice of Removal. The Court waived the requirements of Local Rule 6-1 and granted Plaintiffs Motion to Remand. Accordingly, this action is hereby remanded to Los Angeles Superior Court, Van Nuys Courthouse, Small Claims Division, Case Number 22VESC02090. (See document for further details). (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) Court Reporter: Myra Ponce. (aco) |
Filing 16 Notice OF WITHDRAWAL OF ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES filed by Defendant Toyota Motor Credit Corporation. (Fleming, Daniel) |
Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) and Affirmative Defenses filed by Defendant Toyota Motor Credit Corporation.(Fleming, Daniel) |
Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, re Notice (Other) #11 , Text Only Scheduling Notice, 10 Amended served on December 17, 2022. (Fleming, Daniel) |
Filing 13 ORDER DENYING APPLICATION #12 TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINTby Judge Percy Anderson. Accordingly, the application is denied.; denying #12 APPLICATION for Extension of Time to Answer. (aco) |
Filing 12 First APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 2/17/2023 re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Toyota Motor Credit Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proof of Service) (Fleming, Daniel) |
Filing 11 Notice Notice of Hearing filed by Defendant Toyota Motor Credit Corporation. (Fleming, Daniel) |
Filing 10 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Percy Anderson Status Conference by ZOOM is set for 12/20/2022 at 11:00 AM before Judge Percy Anderson. Please use the link to join the webinar: https://cacd-uscourts.zoomgov.com /j/1604406150?pwd=azl2dk4rcFhvUjJBNmhKLzZoLzRTZz09 Webinar ID: 160 440 6150 Passcode: 397384 THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kss) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Percy Anderson. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco) |
Filing 8 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)] by Judge Percy Anderson. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE set for January 23, 2023, at 10:30 a.m. This action has been assigned to the calendar of United States District Judge Percy Anderson. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco) |
Filing 7 SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. One or more of the parties to this action has elected to appear pro se. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (sh) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Toyota Motor Credit Corporation identifying Toyota Financial Services International Corporation, as Corporate Parent. (Fleming, Daniel) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Toyota Motor Credit Corporation. (Fleming, Daniel) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Van Nuys Courthouse, case number 22VES02090 Receipt No: ACACDC-34449692 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Toyota Motor Credit Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff's Original Claim) (Attorney Daniel C Fleming added to party Toyota Motor Credit Corporation(pty:dft))(Fleming, Daniel) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendant Toyota Motor Credit Corporation.Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Rita Yegoryan.[FILED IN STATE COURT 10/03/2022 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 EXHIBIT A TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rita Yegoryan v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Rita Yegoryan | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Toyota Motor Credit Corporation | |
Represented By: | Daniel C Fleming |
Represented By: | Daniel C. Fleming |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.