Luisana Suarez v. Zumiez Inc. et al
Luisana Suarez |
Zumiez Inc. and Does 1 to 50, inclusive |
2:2022cv08957 |
December 9, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Shashi H. Kewalramani. New Case Number 5:22-cv-02191 SSS(SHKx). (sh) |
CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Zumiez Inc.Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Luisana Suarez.[FILED IN STATE COURT 11/07/2022 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 EXHIBIT A TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside County Superior Court, case number CVRI2204836 Receipt No: ACACDC-34456218 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Zumiez Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Jason Michael Fodrini added to party Zumiez Inc.(pty:dft))(Fodrini, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.