Alondra Peters v. Marriott International Inc.et al
| Alondra Peters |
| Marriott International Inc., a Delaware corporation, Kim Hart, DOES 1 through 50, inclusive., Marina Del Rey Marriott, a business entity of unknown form, Marriott International Inc., DOES 1 through 50, inclusive and Marina Del Rey Marriott |
| 2:2022cv09001 |
| December 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 1/2/24. (rfi)
|
|
Filing 12
Order re Jury Trial by Judge Dale S. Fischer. These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine, unless the Court orders otherwise. See Trial Order for specifics. Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/26/2024 at 3:00 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. Jury Trial set for 3/26/2024 at 8:30 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
|
| Filing 11 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER. The Court takes the Scheduling Conference off calendar and establishes the case management dates as proposed by parties in the Joint Rule 26(f) Report as further described in the Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates except as noted in the Order re Trial. (See Order re Trial for specific dates and times.) These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine unless the Court orders otherwise. All fictitiously named defendants are dismissed. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 10 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 6 days, filed by Defendant Marriott International Inc... (Grix, Monte) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 1/23/2023 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
|
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Marriott International Inc. in Los Angeles Superior Court on 12/12/2022, attached as Exhibit B. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Alondra Peters in Los Angeles Superior Court on 9/12/2022, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Marriott International Inc., a Delaware corporation, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 served on 12/12/2022. (Grix, Monte) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Marriott International Inc., a Delaware corporation, identifying Plaintiff Alondra Peters; Marriott International Inc.; and Marriott Hotel Services, Inc.. (Grix, Monte) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Marriott International Inc., a Delaware corporation. (Attachments: #1 Attachment A to Civil Cover Sheet)(Grix, Monte) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the State of California County of Los Angeles, case number 22STCV29713 with filing fee previously paid (402 paid on 12/12/2022, receipt number 34464551), filed by Defendant Marriott International Inc., a Delaware corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Of Courtney Bleakley In Support Of Removal To Federal Court Of State Court Action, #2 Declaration Of Doreen Hart In Support Of Removal To Federal Court Of State Court Action, #3 Declaration Of Monte K. Grix In Support Of Notice Of Removal To Federal Court, #4 Exhibit A, #5 Exhibit B, #6 Exhibit C) (Attorney Monte Kyle Grix added to party Marriott International Inc., a Delaware corporation(pty:dft))(Grix, Monte) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
