Zhanchao Wang v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
| Zhanchao Wang |
| Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Rosemary Langley Melville, Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and United States Department of Homeland Security |
| 2:2022cv09141 |
| December 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Otis D Wright |
| Naturalization Application |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Pursuant to Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal #11 , and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1): IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: The entire action and all claims asserted therein are hereby DISMISSED. All dates and deadlines in this action are VACATED and taken off calendar. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff Zhanchao Wang. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Fan, Zhenxiong) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Zhanchao Wang, upon Defendant Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 1/4/2023, answer due 3/6/2023; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 1/4/2023, answer due 3/6/2023; Rosemary Langley Melville served on 1/4/2023, answer due 3/6/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Fan, Zhenxiong) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY- No mandatory chambers copies required, EXCEPT FOR MSJs. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerk's Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc)
|
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Rosemary Langley Melville, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Zhanchao Wang. (Fan, Zhenxiong) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Zhanchao Wang, (Fan, Zhenxiong) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Zhanchao Wang. (Fan, Zhenxiong) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34492100 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Zhanchao Wang. (Attorney Zhenxiong Fan added to party Zhanchao Wang(pty:pla))(Fan, Zhenxiong) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
