In re Welscorp, Inc.
Lenard E. Schwartzer |
Dianne Hutchings |
Welscorp, Inc. |
2:2022cv09142 |
December 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Philip S Gutierrez |
Jean P Rosenbluth |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN (USM-285) of Claim of Exemption returned executed upon Brett H Ramsaur on 2/2/23. Remarks: Mailed notice of claim of exemption first class 2/2/2023. Forwarding charge: $8.00. (yl) |
Filing 13 ABSTRACT of Judgment issued in favor of Plaintiff Lenard E. Schwartzer and against Dianne Hutchings in the principal amount of $ 119,988.23, interest in the amount of $ 0.00, attorneys fees of $ 0.00, costs of $ 0.00. RE: MISC - Registration of Judgment from Another District (AO-451), #1 (yl) |
Filing 12 Writ of Execution issued against Dianne Hutchings re: Affidavit and Request for Issuance of Writ of Execution #11 . (yl) |
Filing 11 Affidavit and Request for Issuance of Writ of Execution filed by Plaintiff Lenard E. Schwartzer, In re Debtor Welscorp, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Writ)(Ramsaur, Brett) |
Filing 10 REQUEST for Writ of Execution filed by Plaintiff Lenard E. Schwartzer, Welscorp, Inc.. (Ramsaur, Brett) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY WRIT OF EXECUTION. The document is being returned to you for correction of: Abstracts shall be delivered manually to the Clerk's office for issuance and not electronically filed #4 . (yl) |
Filing 9 CORRECTED ORDER APPOINTING PROCESS SERVER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. The Request is approved. The Judgment Creditor may employ a registered private process server, specifically identified as Nationwide Legal, LLC, who employs California registered process servers over 18 years of age and of suitable discretion, and who is not a party to this action. Nationwide Legal, LLC is authorized and appointed to serve any writ(s) of execution entered in this action. The U.S. Marshal shall remain the levying officer for any writ(s) of execution entered in this action. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (yl) |
Filing 8 ORDER APPOINTING PROCESS SERVER #5 by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. The Judgment Creditor may employ a registered private process server, specifically identified as Nationwide Legal, LLC, who employs California registered process servers over 18 years of age and of suitable discretion, and who is not a party to this action. Nationwide Legal, LLC is authorized and appointed to serve any writ(s) of execution entered in this action. The U.S. Marshal shall remai n the levying officer for any writ(s) ofexecution entered in this action. (yl) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of New Case Number and Judge Assignment by Clerk. This case is hereby converted from case type MC to case type CV because subsequent filings have changed the nature of the case. A new case number has therefore been assigned to this case. District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth are assigned to this new case number. All future documents must be filed under the new case number, which is 2:22-cv-09142-PSG (JPRx). The previous case number, 2:22-mc-00207-UA, is hereby terminated. (et) |
Filing 5 REQUEST for Order for Appointment of Process Server filed by Plaintiff Lenard E. Schwartzer, Welscorp, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Ramsaur, Brett) |
Filing 4 REQUEST for Judgment filed by Plaintiff Lenard E. Schwartzer, Welscorp, Inc.. (Ramsaur, Brett) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Joseph E Sarachek. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (sh) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Zachary E Mazur. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (sh) |
Filing 1 REGISTRATION OF JUDGMENT FROM ANOTHER DISTRICT Receipt No: ACACDC-34222010 - Fee: $49, filed by Plaintiff Lenard E. Schwartzer, Welscorp, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Judgment By Default Against Defendant) (Attorney Brett H Ramsaur added to party Lenard E. Schwartzer(pty:trust), Attorney Brett H Ramsaur added to party Welscorp, Inc.(pty:db))(Ramsaur, Brett) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.