Karen Cain v. Bird Global, Inc. et al
| Karen Cain |
| Bird Global, Inc. F/K/A Switchback II Corporation, Travis Vanderzanden, Yibo Ling, Bird Global, Inc. and Switchback II Corporation |
| 2:2022cv09178 |
| December 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Otis D Wright |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers): Order CONSOLIDATING Case with Arias v. Bird Global (No. 2:22-cv-08406-ODW (AGRx)). by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Pursuant to Plaintiff's response #16 , Defendants' non-response, and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42, and because the two cases are PSLRA cases that arise from the same set of facts, the Court hereby CONSOLIDATES this case with Arias, No. 2:22-cv-08406-ODW (AGRx), for all purposes, with Arias as the lead case. By no later than February 16, 2023, Cain shall refile her Complaint in Arias so that it appears on the docket in the consolidated case. All further filings, including any additional motions related to the Lead Plaintiff question, shall be filed in Arias only. (lom)
|
| Filing 16 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Karen Cainto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,,,, Set/Reset Motion Hearing and R&R Deadlines,,, #11 Response of Plaintiff Karen Cain to Order to Show Cause (Pafiti, Jennifer) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Bird Global, Inc., Yibo Ling, Travis Vanderzanden, identifying Bird Global, Inc., Travis Vanderzanden, and Yibo Ling. (de Bretteville, Jason) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION for Order on Initial Complaint filed by Defendants Bird Global, Inc., Yibo Ling, Travis Vanderzanden. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(de Bretteville, Jason) |
| Filing 13 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Lisa M Northrup counsel for Defendants Bird Global, Inc., Yibo Ling, Travis Vanderzanden. Adding Lisa M. Northrup as counsel of record for Defendants Bird Global, Inc., Travis Vanderzanden, and Yibo Ling for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants Bird Global, Inc., Travis Vanderzanden, and Yibo Ling. (Attorney Lisa M Northrup added to party Bird Global, Inc. (pty:dft), Attorney Lisa M Northrup added to party Yibo Ling(pty:dft), Attorney Lisa M Northrup added to party Travis Vanderzanden(pty:dft))(Northrup, Lisa) |
| Filing 12 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Jason de Bretteville counsel for Defendants Bird Global, Inc., Yibo Ling, Travis Vanderzanden. Adding Jason de Bretteville as counsel of record for Defendants Bird Global, Inc., Travis Vanderzanden, and Yibo Ling for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants Bird Global, Inc., Travis Vanderzanden, and Yibo Ling. (Attorney Jason de Bretteville added to party Bird Global, Inc. (pty:dft), Attorney Jason de Bretteville added to party Yibo Ling(pty:dft), Attorney Jason de Bretteville added to party Travis Vanderzanden(pty:dft))(de Bretteville, Jason) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: ORDER TO SHOW CASE RE CONSOLIDATION. Plaintiff is therefore ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE, in writing only, no later than January 31, 2023, why this case, No. 2:22-cv-09178, Cain v. Bird Global, Inc. et al., should not be consolidated with related case No. 2:22-cv-08406, Arias v. Bird Global Inc., et al. Defendants may file a Reply to Plaintiff's Response, to be received by the Court no later than February 10, 2023. Briefs are limited to ten (10) pages, and the parties may file judicially noticeable materials, declarations, and other evidence in support of their contentions. No hearing will be held. The matter will be deemed submitted, and this Order deemed discharged, upon receipt of the Parties' responses. Failure by a party to timely respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to consolidation of the cases. (lc)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:22-cv-08406 ODW(AGRx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian and Judge Mark C. Scarsi to Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-09178 ODW(AGRx). Signed by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (rn)
|
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (pk)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Bird Global, Inc., Yibo Ling, Travis Vanderzanden. (sh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (sh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Karen Cain, (Pafiti, Jennifer) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Karen Cain. (Pafiti, Jennifer) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Karen Cain. (Pafiti, Jennifer) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34495135 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Karen Cain. (Attorney Jennifer Pafiti added to party Karen Cain(pty:pla))(Pafiti, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
