Liberty Hardware Mfg. Corp. v. Contractors Wardrobe, Inc.
| Liberty Hardware Mfg. Corp. |
| Contractors Wardrobe, Inc. |
| 2:2022cv09210 |
| December 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John W Holcomb |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Contractors Wardrobe, Inc. answer now due 3/13/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Defendant Contractors Wardrobe, Inc..(Wheeler, Brian) |
| Filing 18 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Joseph K Lee counsel for Defendant Contractors Wardrobe, Inc.. Adding Joseph K. Lee as counsel of record for Contractors Wardrobe, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Contractors Wardrobe, Inc.. (Attorney Joseph K Lee added to party Contractors Wardrobe, Inc.(pty:dft))(Lee, Joseph) |
| Filing 17 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Brian M. Wheeler counsel for Defendant Contractors Wardrobe, Inc.. Adding Brian M. Wheeler as counsel of record for Contractors Wardrobe, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Contractors Wardrobe, Inc.. (Attorney Brian M. Wheeler added to party Contractors Wardrobe, Inc.(pty:dft))(Wheeler, Brian) |
| Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Liberty Hardware Mfg. Corp., upon Defendant Contractors Wardrobe, Inc. served on 1/10/2023, answer due 1/31/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Bernadette Z. - Office Manager in compliance with statute not specified by substituted service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kang, Franklin) |
Filing 15
Text Only ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney George D. Moustakas to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Liberty Hardware Mfg. Corp. #13 by Judge John W. Holcomb THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cla) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 14
STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. PLEASE READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THIS CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm)
|
| Filing 13 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney George D. Moustakas to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Liberty Hardware Mfg. Corp. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34522333) filed by plaintiff Liberty Hardware Mfg. Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Kang, Franklin) |
|
Filing 12
NOTICE AND ORDER REGARDING TRANSFER AND/OR REASSIGNMENT OF PATENT CASE by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. Case transferred from Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett to Judge John W. Holcomb for all further proceedings. Case number now reads 2:22-cv-09210 JWH(KSx). (rn)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney George D. Moustakas. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (lh) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Contractors Wardrobe, Inc. (lh) |
| Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (lh) |
| Filing 6 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Liberty Hardware Mfg. Corp.. (Kang, Franklin) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Liberty Hardware Mfg. Corp. identifying Masco Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Kang, Franklin) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Liberty Hardware Mfg. Corp., identifying Masco Corporation. (Kang, Franklin) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by plaintiff Liberty Hardware Mfg. Corp.. (Kang, Franklin) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Liberty Hardware Mfg. Corp.. (Kang, Franklin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34501981 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Liberty Hardware Mfg. Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Q, #18 Exhibit R, #19 Exhibit S) (Attorney Franklin D Kang added to party Liberty Hardware Mfg. Corp.(pty:pla))(Kang, Franklin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
