Implicit, LLC v. Ziff Davis, Inc. et al
| Implicit, LLC |
| ZIFF DAVIS, INC. and MUDHOOK MARKETING, INC. |
| 2:2022cv09453 |
| December 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 GRANTING SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Second Stipulation #16 , the Court grants the request for extension of time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint up through and including 3/27/2023. (gk) |
Filing 18
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth to Judge Andre Birotte Jr for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:22-cv-09453 AB(AFMx). (rn) |
| Filing 16 Second STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 3/27/23 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Mudhook Marketing, Inc., Ziff Davis, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ruttenberg, Guy) |
| Filing 15 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Mudhook Marketing, Inc. answer now due 2/24/2023; Ziff Davis, Inc. answer now due 2/24/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Mudhook Marketing, Inc.; Ziff Davis, Inc..(Attorney Guy Ruttenberg added to party Mudhook Marketing, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Guy Ruttenberg added to party Ziff Davis, Inc.(pty:dft))(Ruttenberg, Guy) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth: Granting #13 Non-Resident Attorney James M. Lennon APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff(s) IMPLICIT, LLC, designating Alex H. Chan as local counsel. (es)
|
| Filing 13 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney James M. Lennon to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Implicit, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34574780) filed by Plaintiff Implicit, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Chan, Alex) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Implicit, LLC, upon Defendant Mudhook Marketing, Inc. served on 1/4/2023, answer due 1/25/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Corporation's Registered Agent - Corporation Service Company in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Chan, Alex) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Implicit, LLC, upon Defendant Ziff Davis, Inc. served on 1/4/2023, answer due 1/25/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Lynanne Gares- On Behalf of Corp's Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Chan, Alex) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney James M Lennon on behalf on Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Mudhook Marketing, Inc. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Ziff Davis, Inc. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge) (ghap) |
| Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Implicit, LLC. (Chan, Alex) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Implicit, LLC. (Chan, Alex) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Implicit, LLC (Chan, Alex) |
| Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Implicit, LLC. (Chan, Alex) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Implicit, LLC. (Chan, Alex) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34547798 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Implicit, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney Alex H Chan added to party Implicit, LLC (pty:pla))(Chan, Alex) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
