Anthony Rapp v. Kevin Spacey Fowler
| Kevin Spacey |
| Kevin Spacey Fowler |
| Adam Vary |
| Anthony Rapp |
| 2:2022mc00030 |
| February 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - RECEIVED Notice of Receipt of Electronic Case Transfer from Southern District of New York, 1:22-mc-00063 filed 2/28/2022. (iv) |
| Filing 14 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon denying #10 #11 EX PARTE APPLICATION of Non-Party Adam Vary to Stay Order Transferring Case. (See document for details). (ib) |
| Filing 13 OPPOSITION TO re: EX PARTE APPLICATION to Stay pending Disposition of Motion to Review Order Transferring Case,, #9 Memorandum; Declaration of Jean-Paul Jassy #10 filed by Defendant Kevin Spacey Fowler. (Scolnick, Chase) |
| Filing 12 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon re EX PARTE APPLICATION #10 of Non-Party Journalist Adam Vary to Stay transfer of case pending Disposition of Motion to Review Order Transferring Case #9 and AMENDMENT to the Ex Parte Application filed by Respondent Adam Vary #10 : Any opposition to the Ex Parte Application to Stay shall be filed by 6:00pm on February 24, 2022. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ib) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 11 Amendment to EX PARTE APPLICATION to Stay pending Disposition of Motion to Review Order Transferring Case,, #9 Memorandum; Declaration of Jean-Paul Jassy #10 filed by Respondent Adam Vary. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Jassy, Jean-Paul) |
| Filing 10 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Stay pending Disposition of Motion to Review Order Transferring Case,, #9 Memorandum; Declaration of Jean-Paul Jassy filed by Non-Party Journalist Adam Vary. (Jassy, Jean-Paul) |
Filing 9
MINUTES (In Chambers): Order Transferring Action to the Southern District of New York by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon: This miscellaneous case relates to a Motion to Compel and for Contempt Re Adam Vary's Deposition and Response to Subpoena Seeking Production of Documents ("Motion"). (ECF No. #1 .) The Motion arises from a Rule 45 subpoena in a case pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The Court has reviewed the Motion and associated papers and finds that exceptional circumstances exist to transfer the case to the Southern District of New York. [See document for further details.] (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (es)
|
| Filing 8 SUPPLEMENT to MISC - Motion Related to Subpoena from Another District,,,, #1 filed by Defendant Kevin Spacey Fowler. (Scolnick, Chase) |
| Filing 7 SUPPLEMENT to MISC - Motion Related to Subpoena from Another District,,,, #1 filed by Respondent Adam Vary. (Jassy, Jean-Paul) |
|
Filing 6
MINUTES (In Chambers): Order Vacating March 15, 2022 Hearing on Movant's Motion to Compel and for Contempt Re Adam Vary's Deposition and Response to Subpoena Seeking Production of Documents (Filed February 9, 2022; ECF No. #1 ) by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. The hearing on Movant's Motion noticed for March 15, 2022, at 10:00 a.m., is TAKEN OFF CALENDAR. No appearance is necessary. Local Rule 7-15. The parties shall file their Supplemental Memorandum of Law no later than February 18, 2022. The motion shall stand submitted on the basis of the papers timely filed. The Court will determine if a hearing is necessary after review of the briefing. (et)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Meghan Elyse Fenzel on behalf of Respondent Adam Vary (Attorney Meghan Elyse Fenzel added to party Adam Vary(pty:res))(Fenzel, Meghan) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Jean-Paul Jassy on behalf of Respondent Adam Vary (Attorney Jean-Paul Jassy added to party Adam Vary(pty:res))(Jassy, Jean-Paul) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF HEARING on Motion to Compel and for contempt Re Adam Vary's Deposition and Response to Subpoena Seeking Production of Documents by Clerk of Court. Counsel is hereby notified that the MISC - Motion Related to Subpoena from Another District, #1 is set for hearing. Motion set for hearing on 3/15/2022 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (lh) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (lh) |
| Filing 1 MOTION RELATED TO A SUBPOENA FROM ANOTHER DISTRICT with filing fee previously paid ($49.00 paid on 02/09/2022, receipt number ACACDC-32762693), filed by Moving Party Kevin Spacey Fowler. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Joint Stipulation Regarding Moving Party's Motion to Compel and for Contempt Re Adam Vary's Deposition and Subpoena for Production of Documents, #2 Declaration of Chase A. Scolnick in Support of Moving Party's Portion of the Joint Stipulation Regarding Dispute Over Deposition of Adam Vary and Subpoena for Production of Documents, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit 5, #8 Exhibit 6, #9 Exhibit 7, #10 Exhibit 8, #11 Exhibit 9, #12 Declaration of Jean-Paul Jassy in Support of Non-Party Journalist Adam Vary's Opposition to Kevin Spacey Fowler's Motion to Compel; with Exhibits 10 and 11, #13 Exhibit 10, #14 Exhibit 11) (Attorney Chase Scolnick added to party Kevin Spacey Fowler(pty:mov))(Scolnick, Chase) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
