Securities and Exchange Commission v. Brian Lam et al.
Petitioner: Securities and Exchange Commission
Respondent: Brian Lam, NINESQUARE CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC and Ninesquare Investment LP
Case Number: 2:2022mc00088
Filed: April 7, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jean P Rosenbluth
Referring Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 31, 2022 Filing 9 DECLARATION of Kathryn C. Wanner in Support of Securities and Exchange Commission's Application for an Order Compelling Compliance with Administrative Subpoenas filed by Petitioner Securities and Exchange Commission. (Wanner, Kathryn)
April 20, 2022 Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Petitioner Securities and Exchange Commission, re Order to Show Cause,,,, #4 upon Respondents Brian Lam, NineSquare Capital Partners, LLC, and NineSquare Investment, LP, served on April 20, 2022. (Wanner, Kathryn)
April 20, 2022 Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Petitioner Securities and Exchange Commission, re MISC - Other Miscellaneous Case,, #1 upon Respondent NineSquare Investment, LP, served on April 11, 2022. (Wanner, Kathryn)
April 20, 2022 Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Petitioner Securities and Exchange Commission, re MISC - Other Miscellaneous Case,, #1 upon Respondent NineSquare Capital Partners, LLC, served on April 11, 2022. (Wanner, Kathryn)
April 20, 2022 Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Petitioner Securities and Exchange Commission, re MISC - Other Miscellaneous Case,, #1 upon Respondent Brian Lam served on April 11, 2022. (Wanner, Kathryn)
April 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY AN ORDER COMPELLING COMPLIANCE WITH ADMINISTRATIVE SUBPOENAS SHOULD NOT BE ISSUED by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: SECs Application for an Order to Show Cause Why an Order Compelling Compliance with Administrative Subpoenas should not be issued is GRANTED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that on JUNE 13, 2022 1:30 PM, each of the Respondents shall appear before Judge Otis D. Wright, II to show cause, if there be any, why an Order Compelling Compliance with Investigative Subpoenas should not be granted in accordance with the Application filed by the SEC herein. Any papers in opposition be filed and served no later than MAY 17, 2022; Any reply be filed and served no later than MAY 31, 2022. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that service of this Order to Show Cause, and any papers in opposition to the issuance of an Order Compelling Compliance, or any reply papers, may be accomplished by electronic mail, facsimile, United Parcel Service or personal service. All such papers must also be emailed on the date of service to Kathryn C. Wanner, counsel for the SEC, at wannerk@sec.gov, and to Respondents or their attorneys of record. (lc)
April 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who havepending cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerk's Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc)
April 11, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (sh)
April 8, 2022 Filing 1 APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND ORDER COMPELLING COMPLIANCE WITH ADMINISTRATIVE SUBPOENAS No Fee Required - US Government, filed by Applicant Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration of Kelly Curtis Bowers, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit 5, #8 Exhibit 6, #9 Exhibit 7, #10 Exhibit 8, #11 Exhibit 9, #12 Exhibit 10, #13 Proposed Order to Show Cause, #14 Proposed Order Compelling Compliance) (Attorney Kathryn C Wanner added to party Securities and Exchange Commission(pty:pet))(Wanner, Kathryn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Brian Lam et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Brian Lam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: NINESQUARE CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ninesquare Investment LP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Securities and Exchange Commission
Represented By: Kathryn C Wanner
Represented By: Kelly Curtis Bowers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?