Schlomo Schmuel v. Felicia Ponce
SCHLOMO SCHMUEL and Felicia Ponce |
2:2022mc00186 |
September 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of New Case Number and Judge Assignment by Clerk. This case is hereby converted from case type MC to case type CV because the incorrect case type was used at case opening. A new case number has therefore been assigned to this case. District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick are assigned to this new case number. All future documents must be filed under the new case number, which is 2:22-cv-07005-SSS (DFM). The previous case number, 2:22-mc-00186, is hereby terminated. (et) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF LODGING filed Proposed Order re PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum as to Schlomo Schmuel #1 (Quintana, Andres) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum as to Schlomo Schmuel #1 . The following error(s) was found: A case-initiating document was submitted without payment of the full filing fee. Within two business days of this notice, counsel must pay the filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis;otherwise, the docket for this case number will be closed and no further filings will be permitted under this case number. The filing fee may be paid online by docketing the event Pay Filing Fee. Other error(s) with document(s): A Proposed Order is required with the Petition. (car) |
FILING FEE PAID for new miscellaneous case. Receipt No. ACACDC-34041216 for $49 filing fee. (Quintana, Andres) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum as to Schlomo Schmuel filed by Petitioner SCHLOMO SCHMUEL. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points & Authorities in Support of Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum, #2 Declaration of Andres F. Quintana, #3 Exhibit A to Quintana Declaration, #4 Exhibit B to Quintana Declaration, #5 Exhibit C to Quintana Declaration, #6 Exhibit D to Quintana Declaration, #7 Exhibit E to Quintana Declaration, #8 Exhibit F to Quintana Declaration, #9 Exhibit G to Quintana Declaration, #10 Exhibit H to Quintana Declaration, #11 Exhibit I to Quintana Declaration, #12 Exhibit J to Quintana Declaration, #13 Exhibit K to Quintana Declaration, #14 Exhibit A to Quintana Declaration) (Attorney Andres F Quintana added to party SCHLOMO SCHMUEL(pty:bkmov)) (Quintana, Andres) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Schlomo Schmuel v. Felicia Ponce | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: SCHLOMO SCHMUEL | |
Represented By: | Andres F Quintana |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Felicia Ponce | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.