In Re Ex Parte Application of Sheikh Walid bin Ibrahim al Ibrahim
Petitioner: Sheikh Walid bin Ibrahim al Ibrahim and Sheikh Walid bin al Ibrahim
Respondent: John David Britt
In Re: In Re Ex Parte Application of Sheikh Walid bin Ibrahim al Ibrahim
Case Number: 2:2022mc00192
Filed: October 11, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Maria A Audero
Referring Judge: Dale S Fischer
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer ADOPTING The U.S. Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation #13 on the Ex Parte Application for an Order Pursuant to 28 USC section 1782 to Obtain Discovery for Use in a Foreign Proceeding. See Order for specifics. (jp)
November 14, 2022 Filing 14 RESPONSE filed by Movant Sheikh Walid bin al Ibrahimto Report and Recommendation (Issued), #13 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Proposed Deposition Examination Topics, #2 Exhibit 2 - Proposed Document Production Requests, #3 Proposed Order)(Weiss, Noah)
October 31, 2022 Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. Re Application/Motion/Request (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 For the reasons below, the Court recommends that the District Court GRANT in part and DENY in part the unopposed Application and ORDER the Proposed Subpoenas served with the revisions recommended herein. (es)
October 31, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE OF FILING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. Objections to R&R due by 11/14/2022. (es)
October 25, 2022 Filing 11 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION of Non-Resident Attorney Jonathan M. Landy to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of In Re In Re Ex Parte Application of Sheikh Walid bin Ibrahim al Ibrahim, Movant Sheikh Walid bin al Ibrahim (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500) #9 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The document is stricken. (jp)
October 24, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION of Non-Resident Attorney Jonathan M. Landy to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of In Re In Re Ex Parte Application of Sheikh Walid bin Ibrahim al Ibrahim, Movant Sheikh Walid bin al Ibrahim (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 #9 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event is Appear Pro Hac Vice (G-64) Local Rule 83-2.1.3.4 Local counsel does not maintain an office within the District. Case information is incomplete. DJ and MJ initials missing on application and proposed order. Please note DJ and MJ Notice of Assignment, dated 10/12/22, Dkt. 7. Proposed Order has not been flattened and is causing a corruption with the filing. Other error(s) with document(s): Document is an APPLICATION, not a NOTICED MOTION. See form caption. (lt)
October 21, 2022 Filing 9 [STRICKEN PER ORDER DATED ON 10/25/2022, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. #11 ] - First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION of Non-Resident Attorney Jonathan M. Landy to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of In Re In Re Ex Parte Application of Sheikh Walid bin Ibrahim al Ibrahim, Movant Sheikh Walid bin al Ibrahim (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34192739) filed by Petitioner In Re Ex Parte Application of Sheikh Walid bin Ibrahim al Ibrahim, Sheikh Walid bin al Ibrahim. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Noah M Weiss added to party In Re Ex Parte Application of Sheikh Walid bin Ibrahim al Ibrahim(pty:inre)) (Weiss, Noah). Modified on 10/25/2022 (jp).
October 12, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Jonathan M Landy on behalf on Movant. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap)
October 12, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (ghap)
October 11, 2022 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Petitioner Sheikh Walid bin Ibrahim al Ibrahim, re Declaration #3 , Application/Motion/Request (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Declaration, #2 served on 10/11/2022. (Weiss, Noah)
October 11, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Petitioner Sheikh Walid bin Ibrahim al Ibrahim, (Weiss, Noah)
October 11, 2022 Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioner Sheikh Walid bin Ibrahim al Ibrahim. (Weiss, Noah)
October 11, 2022 Filing 3 DECLARATION of Jonathan M. Landy re Application/Motion/Request (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Petitioner Sheikh Walid bin Ibrahim al Ibrahim. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 7, #2 Exhibit 8, #3 Exhibit 9)(Weiss, Noah)
October 11, 2022 Filing 2 DECLARATION of Jonathan Brook re Application/Motion/Request (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Petitioner Sheikh Walid bin Ibrahim al Ibrahim. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6)(Weiss, Noah)
October 11, 2022 Filing 1 APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782 TO OBTAIN DISCOVERY FOR USE IN A FOREIGN PROCEEDING AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM Receipt No: ACACDC-34128898 - Fee: $402, filed by Petitioner Sheikh Walid bin Ibrahim al Ibrahim. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Attorney Noah Malachai Weiss added to party Sheikh Walid bin Ibrahim al Ibrahim(pty:pet))(Weiss, Noah)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re Ex Parte Application of Sheikh Walid bin Ibrahim al Ibrahim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Sheikh Walid bin Ibrahim al Ibrahim
Represented By: Noah Malachai Weiss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Sheikh Walid bin al Ibrahim
Represented By: Jonathan M. Landy
Represented By: Noah M Weiss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
In re: In Re Ex Parte Application of Sheikh Walid bin Ibrahim al Ibrahim
Represented By: Noah M Weiss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: John David Britt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?