In Re: 17 USC 512(h) Subpoena to Tonic Domains Corporation
| Motion Picture Association, Inc. |
| Tonic Domains Corporation |
| 17 USC 512(h) Subpoena to Tonic Domains Corporation |
| 2:2022mc00225 |
| November 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CORRECTED SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE issued as to Tonic Domains Corporation. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Subpoena #3 was erroneously issued without the seal of the court. Docket item 3 should be disregarded. (car) |
| Filing 3 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED ON 11/14/2022, SEE ITEM #4 SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE issued as to Tonic Domains Corporation. (car) Modified on 11/14/2022 (car). |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Subpoena filed by Movant Motion Picture Association, Inc.. (Baheri, Tiana) |
| Filing 1 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF DIGITAL MILLENNIUM COPYRIGHT ACT SUBPOENA Receipt No: ACACDC-34314293 - Fee: $49, filed by Movant Motion Picture Association, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jan van Voorn, #2 Letter Notification of Infringement) (Attorney Tiana S. Baheri added to party Motion Picture Association, Inc.(pty:mov))(Baheri, Tiana) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
