Tristram Buckley v. Sprint Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff: Tristram Buckley
Defendant: Sprint Solutions, Inc., Masayoshi Son, Manager John Doe, Spring Store No. 6875 and DOES 1-100
Case Number: 2:2023cv00012
Filed: January 3, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Maria A Audero
Referring Judge: Michael W Fitzgerald
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 1, 2023 Filing 22 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles Superior Court. (iv)
March 1, 2023 Filing 20 DECLARATION of Tristram Buckley In Support of Ex Parte Application First EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue Motion to Compel Arbitration from March 6, 2023 to April 3, 2023 Re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #9 #17 filed by Plaintiff Tristram Buckley. (Buckley, Tristram)
February 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AS MOOT #9 ; ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND #10 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The Remand Motion is GRANTED. The Court orders the Clerk to REMAND this action to the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles. Defendant's Motion to Compel is therefore DENIED as moot. MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (iv)
February 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MINUTES (In Chambers): ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECUSAL OF THE HONORABLE MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD #13 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Accordingly, the Motion is DENIED. (lom)
February 27, 2023 Filing 18 OPPOSITION In Opposition re: First EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue Motion to Compel Arbitration from March 6, 2023 to April 3, 2023 Re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #9 #17 filed by Defendant Sprint Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Of Rachel E. K. Lowe In Support Of Sprint Solutions, Inc.s Opposition To Plaintiffs Ex Parte Application to Continue Hearing Date on Motion to Compel Arbitration)(Lowe, Rachel)
February 24, 2023 Filing 17 First EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue Motion to Compel Arbitration from March 6, 2023 to April 3, 2023 Re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #9 filed by Plaintiff Tristram Buckley. (Buckley, Tristram)
February 17, 2023 Filing 16 NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #9 filed by Defendant Sprint Solutions, Inc.. (Lowe, Rachel)
February 17, 2023 Filing 15 REPLY In Support of Motion First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #10 filed by Plaintiff Tristram Buckley. (Buckley, Tristram)
February 13, 2023 Filing 14 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #10 filed by Defendant Sprint Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Rachel E. K. Lowe)(Lowe, Rachel)
February 6, 2023 Filing 13 First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Disqualify Magistrate Judge MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD filed by Plaintiff Tristram Buckley. Motion set for hearing on 3/6/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. (Buckley, Tristram)
February 6, 2023 Filing 12 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: Motion to Remand Case #10 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The hearing date has been rescheduled for 3/6/2023 at 10:00 AM. The hearing on Defendant Sprint Solutions, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Arbitration #9 is also CONTINUED to March 6, 2023, at 10:00am. (iv)
February 6, 2023 Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Filed Document RE: First Motion to Remand Case #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed document was not submitted. Local Rule 7-3 compliance statement missing. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (iv)
February 3, 2023 Filing 10 First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Tristram Buckley. Motion set for hearing on 2/27/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. (Attorney Tristram T Buckley added to party Tristram Buckley(pty:pla)) (Buckley, Tristram)
January 10, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Defendant Sprint Solutions, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 2/13/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Of Sprint Solutions, Inc.s Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Arbitration And Stay Action, #2 Declaration of Brandon Ross Howard In Support of Motion To Compel Arbitration And Stay Action, #3 Proposed Order Granting Spring Solutions, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action) (Lowe, Rachel)
January 5, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:23-cv-00012 MWF(MAAx). (rn)
January 5, 2023 Filing 7 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Defendant Sprint Solutions, Inc.. (Lowe, Rachel)
January 5, 2023 Filing 6 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Lisa L. Garcia counsel for Defendant Sprint Solutions, Inc.. Adding Lisa L. Garcia as counsel of record for Sprint Solutions, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Sprint Solutions, Inc.. (Garcia, Lisa)
January 5, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (Attachments: #1 CV11C) (jtil)
January 3, 2023 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Tristram Buckley on 11/2/2021, attached to Lowe Decl as Exhibit C. (jtil)
January 3, 2023 Filing 4 DECLARATION of Brandon Ross Howard re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,, #1 filed by Defendant Sprint Solutions, Inc.. (Lowe, Rachel)
January 3, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Sprint Solutions, Inc., (Lowe, Rachel)
January 3, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Sprint Solutions, Inc.. (Lowe, Rachel)
January 3, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 19SMCV01873 Receipt No: ACACDC-34555110 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Sprint Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Rachel Lowe In Support of Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - First Amended Complaint, #4 Exhibit C - Second Amended Complaint, #5 Exhibit D - Judgment, #6 Exhibit E - Courts Ruling and Order Re: (1) Motion to set Aside Void Judgment Pursuant to CCP 473(d) and (2) Motion for Relief From Judgment and Dismissal (Pursuant to CCP 473(b)), #7 Exhibit F - Summons and Service of Process, #8 Exhibit G - Secretary of State - Statement of Information Corporation, #9 Exhibit H - Highlighted Motion to set Aside Void Judgment Pursuant to CCP 473(d), #10 Exhibit I - Notice of Filing Removal) (Attorney Rachel E K Lowe added to party Sprint Solutions, Inc.(pty:dft))(Lowe, Rachel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tristram Buckley v. Sprint Solutions, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tristram Buckley
Represented By: Tristram T Buckley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sprint Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: Rachel E K Lowe
Represented By: Lisa L. Garcia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Masayoshi Son
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Manager John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Spring Store No. 6875
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-100
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?