The North River Insurance Company v. James River Insurance Company
Plaintiff: The North River Insurance Company
Defendant: James River Insurance Company
Petitioner: JAMES RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY, an Ohio Corporation
Case Number: 2:2023cv00027
Filed: January 4, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles F Eick
Referring Judge: Ronald SW Lew
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT #14 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. Defendant shall respond to the Complaint on or before Monday, April 3, 2023. (lom)
March 2, 2023 Filing 14 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to James River Insurance Company answer now due 4/3/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant James River Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sacro, Jennifer)
February 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: Upon Stipulation #12 , Defendant James River Insurance Company shall respond to the Complaint on or before 3/3/2023. (gk)
February 22, 2023 Filing 12 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to James River Insurance Company answer now due 3/3/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant James River Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sacro, Jennifer)
January 23, 2023 Filing 11 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Larry Mark Golub counsel for Defendant James River Insurance Company. Adding Larry M. Golub as counsel of record for James River Insurance Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant James River Insurance Company. (Attorney Larry Mark Golub added to party James River Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Golub, Larry)
January 19, 2023 Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to James River Insurance Company answer now due 2/24/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant James River Insurance Company.(Attorney Jennifer Yu Sacro added to party James River Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Sacro, Jennifer)
January 9, 2023 Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff The North River Insurance Company, upon Defendant James River Insurance Company served on 1/5/2023, answer due 1/26/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Koy Saechao, Authorized Agent for CSC Lawyers Inc., Agent for Service of Process on Defendant in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Curet, Blaise)
January 5, 2023 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant James River Insurance Company. (sh)
January 5, 2023 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh)
January 5, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh)
January 5, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (sh)
January 4, 2023 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties, #3 filed by Plaintiff The North River Insurance Company. (Curet, Blaise)
January 4, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff The North River Insurance Company, identifying United States Fire Insurance Company, a Delaware corporation; Crum & Forster Holdings Corp., a Delaware corporation; Fairfax (US) Inc., a Delaware corporation; FFHL Group Ltd., a Canadian company; and Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited, a Canadian public company. (Curet, Blaise)
January 4, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff The North River Insurance Company. (Curet, Blaise)
January 4, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34559937 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff The North River Insurance Company. (Attorney Blaise S Curet added to party The North River Insurance Company(pty:pla))(Curet, Blaise)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The North River Insurance Company v. James River Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The North River Insurance Company
Represented By: Blaise S Curet
Represented By: Sharon R Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JAMES RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY, an Ohio Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James River Insurance Company
Represented By: Larry Mark Golub
Represented By: Jennifer Yu Sacro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?