Dion Joyner v. ZenResolve, LLC
Dion Joyner and ZenResolve, LLC |
2:2023cv00159 |
January 10, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
R Gary Klausner |
Alka Sagar |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff Dion Joyner. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Diehl, Anthony) |
Filing 13 (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge R. Gary Klausner. The court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before 2/23/2023, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to certain defendant/s. (See Civil Minutes for further specifics). (jp) |
Filing 12 SCHEDULING NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES AND ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge R. Gary Klausner: The Court has reviewed the Notice of Settlement #11 filed on February 3, 2023. The parties are hereby notified that they are not relieved of any deadlines or Court appearances until a dismissal of the action is filed. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dbe) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement and Certificate of Service filed by plaintiff Dion Joyner. (Diehl, Anthony) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Dion Joyner, upon Defendant ZenResolve, LLC served on 1/13/2023, answer due 2/3/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Stefan Andrews, Clerk in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Diehl, Anthony) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant ZenResolve, LLC. (lh) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (lh) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Dion Joyner, (Diehl, Anthony) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Dion Joyner. (Diehl, Anthony) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant Dion Joyner. (Diehl, Anthony) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34594904 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Dion Joyner. (Attorney Anthony Paul Diehl added to party Dion Joyner(pty:bkmov))(Diehl, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Dion Joyner v. ZenResolve, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Dion Joyner | |
Represented By: | Anthony Paul Diehl |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: ZenResolve, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.