Crystal Miller v. Roche Diagnostics Corporation et al
| Crystal Miller |
| Roche Diagnostics Corporation, Roche Diagnostics Inc. and DOES 1 through 60, inclusive |
| 2:2023cv00192 |
| January 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Otis D Wright |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. (lc)
|
|
Filing 15
SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (JURY TRIAL) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE IS VACATED. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/6/2024 01:30 PM : Jury Trial set for 6/4/2024 09:00 AM ; Motion in Limine set for hearing on 5/20/2024 at 01:30 PM (SEE DOCUMENT FOR ALL SPECIFIED DEADLINES). (lc)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Report #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan. Other error(s) with document(s): Note: To assist in a search for correct events, please use the "SEARCH" option for a "key word" to narrow the selection process. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 13 JOINT REPORT of Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(f) and pursuant to Order Re: Scheduling Conference [Dkt. 10] filed by Defendant Roche Diagnostics Corporation. (Estes, Ryan) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Crystal Miller, (Jacob, Michael) |
| Filing 11 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by plaintiff Crystal Miller.. (Jacob, Michael) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for March 13, 2023 at 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II. (lc)
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY- No mandatory chambers copies required, EXCEPT FOR EXCEPT FOR motions for summary judgment and any other evidence-heavy motions.. The Courts Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the US District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerks Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Courts Website and Judges procedures for information as applicable. (lc)
|
| Filing 8 Notice of Compliance with 28 U.S.C. 1446(d) filed by Defendant Roche Diagnostics Corporation. (Estes, Ryan) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Crystal Miller in Los Angeles Superior Court on 11/15/2022, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Roche Diagnostics Corporation in Los Angeles Superior Court on 1/9/2023, attached as Exhibit L. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Roche Diagnostics Corporation, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,,, #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 served on 1/11/2023. (Lake, Holly) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Roche Diagnostics Corporation, identifying Roche Holdings, Inc., and Roche Holding Ltd.. (Lake, Holly) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Roche Diagnostics Corporation. (Lake, Holly) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 22STCV36112 Receipt No: ACACDC-34601863 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Roche Diagnostics Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Holly R. Lake, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Summons, #4 Exhibit C - Civil Case Cover Sheet and Addendum, #5 Exhibit D - Notice of Case Assignment, #6 Exhibit E - ADR Packet, #7 Exhibit F - First Amended General Order, #8 Exhibit G - Voluntary Efficient Litigation Stipulations, #9 Exhibit H - Order to Show Cause Failure to File Proof of Service, #10 Exhibit I - Notice of CMC, #11 Exhibit J - Proof of Service, #12 Exhibit K - Proof of Service of Summons, #13 Exhibit L - Answer to Complaint, #14 Exhibit M - Peremptory Challenge, #15 Exhibit N - Declaration in Support of Peremptory Challenge, #16 Exhibit O - Proof of Service, #17 Exhibit P - Secretary of State Business Search, #18 Declaration of Bridget Boyle, #19 Declaration of Emily Kennedy) (Attorney Holly R Lake added to party Roche Diagnostics Corporation(pty:dft))(Lake, Holly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
