Terrence C. Daniels v. City of Los Angeles et al
| Terrence C. Daniels |
| City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Superior Court North Central District, State of California, County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Superior Court, Los Angeles Police Department and Los Angeles Fire Department |
| 2:2023cv00202 |
| January 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson, re First Amended Complaint #12 . The FAC is dismissed with leave to amend. If Plaintiff still wishes to pursue this action, he is granted thirty (30) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order within which to file a Second Amended Complaint. (see document for further details) (Attachments: #1 Blank Civil Rights Complaint Form, #2 Blank Notice of Dismissal Form) (hr)
|
|
Filing 12
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Superior Court, Los Angeles Fire Department, Los Angeles Police Department amending Complaint #1 , filed by Plaintiff Terrence C. Daniels(hr)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Terrence C. Daniels pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to State of California. (hr)
|
|
Filing 10
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson, re Complaint #1 . The Complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. If Plaintiff still wishes to pursue this action, he is granted thirty (30) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order within which to file a First Amended Complaint. (see document for further details) (Attachments: #1 Blank Civil Rights Complaint Form, #2 Blank Notice of Dismissal Form) (hr)
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson: denying #7 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel. Plaintiff's Motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice. (see document for further details) (hr)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISQUALIFY #6 by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. See document for details. (gk)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Court Appointment of Attorney filed by Plaintiff Terrence C. Daniels. (et)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Disqualify Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. filed by Plaintiff Terrence C. Daniels. (hr)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PAYING A FILING FEE #3 by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. Thus, the Court grants Plaintiffs application. IT IS SO ORDERED. (rolm)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (jtil)
|
|
Filing 3
REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Terrence C. Daniels. (jtil)
|
|
Filing 2
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Terrence C. Daniels. (jtil)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT, filed by Plaintiff Terrence C. Daniels against Defendants City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Superior Court North Central District, State of California. Case assigned to Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (Attachments: #1 CV71) #2 Summons Issued) (jtil).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
