United States of America v. City National Bank
| United States of America |
| City National Bank |
| 2:2023cv00204 |
| January 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
CONSENT ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The parties enter into this Consent Order to voluntarily resolve all claims arising from the conduct alleged in the Complaint. Entry of this Consent Order is in the public interest. The parties agree that the full implementation of the terms in this Consent Order will provide a resolution to the claims asserted in the Complaint in a manner consistent with City National's legitimate business interests. The date this Consent Order is entered by the Court is the "Effective Date." Within 120 days of the Effective Date, City National must conduct a detailed assessment of the Bank's fair lending program in the Los Angeles Lending Area. Within 150 days of the Effective Date, City National will submit the Fair Lending Status Report and Compliance Plan. City National will invest a minimum of $29,500,000 in a loan subsidy fund with the goal of increasing credit for home mortgage loans, home improvement loans, and home refinance loans extended in majority-Black and Hispanic neighborhoods in the Los Angeles MD. City National will partner with one or more community-based or governmental organizations that provide the residents of majority-Black and Hispanic census tracts in the Los Angeles Lending Area with services related to credit, financial education, homeownership, and foreclosure prevention. Through these partnerships, the Bank must spend a minimum of $750,000 over the term of this Consent Order on professional services to residents of majority-Black and Hispanic census tracts in the Los Angles Lending Area that increase access to residential mortgage credit. City National will spend at least $100,000 per year ($500,000 over the term of the Consent Order) on advertising and outreach in the Los Angeles Lending Area described in this Section. City National will spend a minimum of $100,000 per year ($500,000 over the term of the Order) on a consumer financial education program designed to provide information, training, and counseling services about consumer financial to residents of these areas. The parties to this Consent Order will bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. See document for further details. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (gk)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee: GRANTING #15 Non-Resident Attorney Jessica M. Shannon APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant City National Bank, designating Daniel Prince as local counsel. (shb)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee: GRANTING #14 Non-Resident Attorney Jonice M. Gray Tucker APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant, City National Bank, designating Daniel Prince as local counsel. (shb)
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jessica Shannon to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant City National Bank (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Previously Paid on 1/25/2023, Receipt No. 34680009) #15 , APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jonice M. Gray Tucker to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant City National Bank (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34680210) #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 5-4.3.4 Application not hand-signed. Case information is incomplete. DJ and MJ initials missing on application and proposed order. Please note DJ and MJ Notice of Assignment, dated 1/13/23, Dkt. 5. Other error(s) with document(s): Please note that electronic, image or stamp signatures are not allowed for either applicant or local counsel. See Instructions for Applicants (1). (lt) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Business or Contact Information: for attorney Daniel Prince counsel for Defendant City National Bank. Changing Firm Name to Paul Hastings LLP, 515 South Flower Street, Twenty-Fifth Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071; Tel: 213-683-6000, Fax: 213-627-0705. Changing Email to danielprince@paulhastings.com. Filed by Defendant City National Bank. (Prince, Daniel) |
| Filing 15 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jessica Shannon to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant City National Bank (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Previously Paid on 1/25/2023, Receipt No. 34680009) filed by defendant City National Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Certificate of Good Standing Washington DC, #2 Exhibit 2 - Certificate of Good Standing for New York, #3 Proposed Order Granting Pro Hac Vice Application for Jessica Shannon) (Prince, Daniel) |
| Filing 14 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jonice M. Gray Tucker to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant City National Bank (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34680210) filed by defendant City National Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Certificate of Good Standing Washington DC, #2 Exhibit 2 - Certificate of Good Standing for Maryland, #3 Proposed Order Granting Pro Hac Vice Application for Jonice Gray Tucker) (Prince, Daniel) |
| Filing 13 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Joseph Neill Montoya counsel for Defendant City National Bank. Filed by defendant City National Bank. (Attorney Joseph Neill Montoya added to party City National Bank(pty:dft))(Montoya, Joseph) |
| Filing 12 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Daniel Prince counsel for Defendant City National Bank. Adding Daniel Prince as counsel of record for City National Bank for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by defendant City National Bank. (Attorney Daniel Prince added to party City National Bank(pty:dft))(Prince, Daniel) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Kinara Ann Flagg on behalf of Plaintiff United States of America (Attorney Kinara Ann Flagg added to party United States of America(pty:pla))(Flagg, Kinara) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Sara Lewenberg Niles on behalf of Plaintiff United States of America (Attorney Sara Lewenberg Niles added to party United States of America(pty:pla))(Niles, Sara) |
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff United States of America, re Notice of Lodging #3 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on January 13, 2023. (Hikida, Katherine) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Hikida, Katherine) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 (Attachments: #1 (proposed) Consent Order)(Hikida, Katherine) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Hikida, Katherine) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT No Fee Required - US Government, filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (Attorney Katherine M Hikida added to party United States of America(pty:pla))(Hikida, Katherine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
