Healthcare Ally Management of California, LLC v. Kyocera SGS Precision Tools, Inc. et al
| Healthcare Ally Management of California, LLC |
| Kyocera SGS Precision Tools, Inc. and Does 1-10 |
| 2:2023cv00423 |
| January 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER RE JURY TRIAL by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Last Day to Add Parties/Amend Pleadings 10/30/2023. Non-expert Discovery Cut-off 2/23/2024. Last Day to Hear Motions 3/25/2024. File Memorandum of Contentions of Fact and Law, Exhibit and Witness Lists, Status Report regarding settlement, and all Motions in Limine 5/20/2024. Final Pretrial Conference and Hearing on Motions in Limine set for 6/10/2024 at 11:00 AM. Trial Date (Est. 4 Days) set for 7/2/2024 at 8:30 AM. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (iv)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 4/12/2024. (iv)
|
|
Filing 11
SCHEDULING NOTICE and ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. On its own motion, the Court VACATES the Scheduling Conference set for 3/13/2023 at 11:00 a.m. No appearances shall be made. The Court will review the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report and issue pretrial and trial dates by separate order. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (smom) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 10 JOINT REPORT of RULE 26(F) filed by Defendant Kyocera SGS Precision Tools, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Bauch, Jim) |
|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING NOTICE AND ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Scheduling Conference set for 3/13/2023 at 11:00 AM before Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. (rs)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:23-cv-00423 MWF(RAOx). (rn)
|
| Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Kyocera SGS Precision Tools, Inc., of Notice to Adverse Party of Removal served on 1/20/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Adverse Party)(Bauch, Jim) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Kyocera SGS Precision Tools, Inc. identifying Kyocera Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Bauch, Jim) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Kyocera SGS Precision Tools, Inc.. (Bauch, Jim) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 22STCV34561 Receipt No: ACACDC-34650908 - Fee: $402, filed by defendant Kyocera SGS Precision Tools, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (FAC), #2 Exhibit B (Summons on FAC), #3 AGO & VEL stips, #4 state court cover sheet, #5 Original Complaint, #6 Notice of Case Assignment, #7 Notice of CMC, #8 Summons on Complaint, #9 POS of Summons on complaint, #10 POS of Summons on FAC, #11 Answer to FAC, #12 Proof of service) (Attorney Jim D Bauch added to party Kyocera SGS Precision Tools, Inc.(pty:dft))(Bauch, Jim) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Healthcare Ally Management of California, LLC, upon Defendant Kyocera SGS Precision Tools, Inc. served on 10/31/2022, answer due 11/21/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Trudy Desbiens-Authorized To Accept Service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 11/16/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-10, Kyocera SGS Precision Tools, Inc. amending Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , filed by plaintiff Healthcare Ally Management of California, LLC. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 12/9/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-10, Kyocera SGS Precision Tools, Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Healthcare Ally Management of California, LLC. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 10/28/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Healthcare Ally Management of California, LLC, upon Defendant Kyocera SGS Precision Tools, Inc. served on 12/21/2022, answer due 1/11/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jenn Bautista, Autorized to Accept Service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 12/27/22 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Kyocera SGS Precision Tools, Inc. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 1/19/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
