Dominique Johnson v. Southwest Airlines Co. et al
| Dominique Johnson |
| Southwest Airlines Co. and Does 1 through 100 |
| 2:2023cv00453 |
| January 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Proof of Service (subsequent documents) #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 11-3.8 title page is missing, incomplete, or incorrect. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Dominique Johnson, re Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan #11 served on 3/17/2023. (Leones, Valerie) |
| Filing 11 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5-7 days, filed by Plaintiff Dominique Johnson.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Leones, Valerie) |
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Scheduling Conference set for 3/31/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Southwest Airlines Co. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 1/19/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B TO DECLARATION OF MARIANNA BERTIKIAN)(ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 100, Southwest Airlines Co. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Dominique Johnson. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 12/19/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A TO DECLARATION OF MARIANNA BERTIKIAN) (ghap) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Southwest Airlines Co. (Bertikian, Marianna) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Southwest Airlines Co.. (Bertikian, Marianna) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Southwest Airlines Co., identifying The Vanguard Group. (Bertikian, Marianna) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Southwest Airlines Co.. (Bertikian, Marianna) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 22STCV39225 Receipt No: ACACDC-34653194 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Southwest Airlines Co.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration DECLARATION OF MARIANNA BERTIKIAN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT SOUTHWEST AIRLINES, COS NOTICE OF PETITION FOR REMOVAL PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C 1332, 1441, AND 1446, #2 Declaration DECLARATION OF SHARI CONAWAY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT SOUTHWEST AIRLINES, CO'S NOTICE OF PETITION FOR REMOVAL PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C 1332, 1441, AND 1446) (Attorney Marianna Bertikian added to party Southwest Airlines Co.(pty:dft))(Bertikian, Marianna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
