Lauren Boden et al v. Joseph E Caceres
| Lauren Boden and Jeff Benjamin |
| Joseph E Caceres |
| 2:2023cv00484 |
| January 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson. Pursuant to the Court's March 1, 2023 Minute Order dismissing this action for failure to establish this Court's subject matter jurisdiction, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. RE: MINUTES IN CHAMBERS-COURT ORDER, #13 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (aco) |
Filing 13
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS-COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. For the reasons stated above, the Court dismisses Plaintiffs' SAC without leave to amend. The Court will issue a Judgment consistent with this Order. (See document for further details). (aco)
|
| Filing 12 PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Joseph E Caceres amending First Amended Complaint #10 , filed by Plaintiffs Lauren Boden, Jeff Benjamin. (aco) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS-COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. For the following reasons, the Court dismisses Plaintiffs' FAC with leave to amend. Failure to file a Second Amended Complaint on or before February 24, 2023 or to adequately allege the Court's jurisdiction may result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). RE: PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #10 . (aco)
|
| Filing 10 PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Joseph E Caceres amending Complaint - (Discovery), #1 filed by plaintiffs Lauren Boden, Jeff Benjamin. (aco) |
|
Filing 8
SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. One or more of the parties to this action has elected to appear pro se. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco)
|
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Percy Anderson. *See order for requirements.* (vdr)
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS-COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. Because Plaintiffs have not adequately alleged this Court's jurisdiction, the Complaint is dismissed. Despite these inadequacies, the Court grants Plaintiff leave to amend the Complaint to attempt to establish federal subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, if any, shall be filed on or before February 13, 2023. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Jeff Benjamin, Lauren Boden. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Joseph E Caceres. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant Joseph E Caceres. Case assigned to Judge Percy Anderson for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F MacKinnon.(Filing fee $ 402:PAID) Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiffs Lauren Boden, Jeff Benjamin. (Attachments: #1 CV-71) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
