Healthcare Ally Management of California, LLC v. Amtrak Company et al
Plaintiff: Healthcare Ally Management of California, LLC
Defendant: Amtrak Company and Does 1 -10
Case Number: 2:2023cv00493
Filed: January 23, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Chooljian
Referring Judge: John F Walter
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge John F. Walter. In the Notice of Settlement filed on February 13, 2023 #12 , the parties represent that they have settled this action. As a result, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice subject to either party reopening the action on or before April 14, 2023. The Court will retain jurisdiction for the sole purpose of enforcing the settlement until April 14, 2023. Thereafter, absent further order of the Court, the dismissal of this action will be with prejudice. All dates in this action, including the trial date are vacated. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (iv)
February 13, 2023 Filing 12 NOTICE of Settlement and Request to Vacate Scheduling Conference filed by Defendant Amtrak Company. (Grewal, Gurinder)
January 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS #10 by Judge John F. Walter. Defendant's deadline to respond to Plaintiffs Complaint is extended to March 1, 2023. (iv)
January 26, 2023 Filing 10 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to filed by Defendant Amtrak Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Grewal, Gurinder)
January 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom)
January 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS): COURT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for March 6, 2023 at 1:15 p.m. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before February 15, 2023. The title page of the Joint Report must state the date and time of the Scheduling Conference. (lom)
January 24, 2023 Filing 7 Notice CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Amtrak Company. (Grewal, Gurinder)
January 24, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap)
January 24, 2023 Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap)
January 24, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
January 24, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (ghap)
January 23, 2023 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Amtrak Company, Does 1-10 amending Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , filed by plaintiff Healthcare Ally Management of California, LLC. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 12/12/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A)(ghap)
January 23, 2023 Filing 2 Certificate and Notice of Interested Parties CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Amtrak Company, (Grewal, Gurinder)
January 23, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court of California, case number 22 STCV 34536 Receipt No: ACACDC-34662988 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Amtrak Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Gurinder Singh Grewal added to party Amtrak Company(pty:dft))(Grewal, Gurinder)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Healthcare Ally Management of California, LLC v. Amtrak Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Healthcare Ally Management of California, LLC
Represented By: Jonathan Aaron Stieglitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amtrak Company
Represented By: Gurinder Singh Grewal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 -10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?