Ying Zhang v. Jaddou Ur Mendoza et al
Ying Zhang |
Jaddou Ur-Mendoza, Director Susan M. Curda, Corina A. Luna and Susan M. Curda |
2:2023cv00512 |
January 23, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
Alka Sagar |
Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Susan M. Curda, Corina A. Luna, and Jaddou Ur-Mendoza. (jtil) |
Filing 7 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (jtil) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Ying Zhang, (Spence, Joel) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Ying Zhang. (Spence, Joel) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Ying Zhang. (Spence, Joel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: CCACDC-34665724 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Ying Zhang. (Attorney Joel E Spence added to party Ying Zhang(pty:pla))(Spence, Joel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.