Desmond Romell Pryer v. Bryan D. Phillips
| Desmond Romell Pryer |
| Bryan D. Phillips |
| 2:2023cv00579 |
| January 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTIFICATION from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of case number assigned and briefing schedule. Appeal Docket No. 23-55183 assigned to Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #8 as to petitioner Desmond Romell Pryer. (mat) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th CCA filed by petitioner Desmond Romell Pryer. Appeal of Judgment #6 , Order on Petition for Certificate of Appealability #7 Filed On: 1/30/23; Entered On: 1/30/23; Certificate of Appealability has been ruled on 1/30/23 see item 7. (mat) |
Filing 7
ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. IT IS ORDERED that the Certificate of Appealability is denied. Re Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254). #1 (vmun)
|
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and dismissed without prejudice. Related to Order Dismissing Case #5 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (vmun) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Fernando M. Olguin re Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254). #1 The Petition is denied and dismissed without prejudice. (See document for details) (vmun)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (lh) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION in Support of Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Petitioner Desmond Romell Pryer. (lh) |
| Filing 2 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Petitioner Desmond Romell Pryer, re Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254), #1 served on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Exhibits A-G. (lh) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254). Case assigned to Judge Fernando M. Olguin and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (Filing Fee $5 DUE), filed by Petitioner Desmond Romell Pryer. (Attachments: #1 Part 2 of 2 to Petition) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Desmond Romell Pryer v. Bryan D. Phillips | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Desmond Romell Pryer | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Bryan D. Phillips | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
