Hyperlync Technologies, Inc. v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
Hyperlync Technologies, Inc. |
T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive |
2:2023cv00734 |
January 31, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John A Kronstadt |
Karen L Stevenson |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 5/8/2023 at 08:30 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Price, Kristen) |
![]() |
Filing 18 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Steve Kim to Judge John A. Kronstadt for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:23-cv-00734 JAK(KSx). (rn) |
Filing 16 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (hr) |
![]() |
Filing 15 Amended APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Callie A. Castillo to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500.00 Previously Paid on 2/23/2023, Receipt No. 34844144) filed by Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Smith, Stephen) |
Filing 14 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Callie A. Castillo to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34844144) #10 by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. The document is stricken. Counsel is ordered to file an amended application, correcting the deficiencies identified in the Notice to Filer of Deficiencies issued on February 24, 2023. (ECF 11). (et) |
![]() |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Extend Time to File Answer to 3/31/2023 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Price, Kristen) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Callie A. Castillo to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34844144) #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 5-4.3.4 Application not hand-signed. PHV attorney zip code is incomplete. Other error(s) with document(s): Please note that electronic, image or stamp signatures are not allowed for either applicant or local counsel. See Instructions for Applicants (1). (lt) |
Filing 10 *STRICKEN DOCUMENT SEE ORDER DOCKET ENTRY NO. #14 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Callie A. Castillo to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34844144) filed by Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Stephen S Smith added to party T-Mobile USA, Inc.(pty:dft)) (Smith, Stephen) Modified on 2/27/2023 (et). |
Filing 9 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Kristen Price counsel for Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc.. Adding Kristen L Price as counsel of record for Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc.. (Attorney Kristen Price added to party T-Mobile USA, Inc.(pty:dft))(Price, Kristen) |
Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Hyperlync Technologies, Inc., upon Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. served on 2/8/2023, answer due 3/1/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Barrera, Patricio) |
![]() |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments 1 Civil Cover Sheet is attached to the Complaint. Each of these documents should have been filed and entered separately under its correct event/relief. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap) |
Filing 5 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge) (ghap) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by PLAINTIFF Hyperlync Technologies, Inc.. (Barrera, Patricio) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by PLAINTIFF Hyperlync Technologies, Inc., (Barrera, Patricio) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34716039 - Fee: $402, filed by PLAINTIFF Hyperlync Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Patricio T Barrera added to party Hyperlync Technologies, Inc.(pty:pla))(Barrera, Patricio) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.