Marquessa Margolin v. Gus T. May et al
| Marquessa Margolin |
| The Honorable Gus T. May, Los Angeles County Superior Court, Commission on Judicial Performance, Does 1-10 and County of Los Angeles |
| 2:2023cv00805 |
| February 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| Sunshine Suzanne Sykes |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 DECLARATION of Sarah L. Overton in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #9 filed by Defendants County of Los Angeles, Gus T. May. (Overton, Sarah) |
| Filing 10 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #9 filed by Defendants Los Angeles County Superior Court, Gus T. May. (Overton, Sarah) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by defendants Los Angeles County Superior Court, Gus T. May. Motion set for hearing on 5/16/2023 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Sarah L Overton added to party Los Angeles County Superior Court(pty:dft)) (Overton, Sarah) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Gus T. May answer now due 3/23/2023, re Complaint - (Referred), #1 filed by defendant Gus T. May.(Attorney Sarah L Overton added to party Gus T. May(pty:dft))(Overton, Sarah) |
Filing 7
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon: Granting #3 APPLICATION for Pro Se Electronic Filing. The applicant must register to use the Courts CM/ECF System within five (5) days of being served with this order. Registration information is available at the Pro Se Litigant E-Filing web page located on the Courts website. Upon registering, the applicant will receive a CM/ECF login and password that will allow him/her to file non-sealed documents electronically in this case only. Any documents being submitted under seal must be manually filed with the Clerk. (es)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER RE CIVIL RIGHTS CASE by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), plaintiff must serve the Summons and Complaint on all named defendants in this action within 90 days after the filing of the Complaint. The Complaint was filed on February 2, 2023. Accordingly, the 90-day period will expire on May 3, 2023. Plaintiff shall file a Proof of Service of the Summons and Complaint within ten (10) days of service. [See document for further information.] (es)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (car) |
| Filing 4 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendants Commission on Judicial Performance, Los Angeles County Superior Court, Gus T. May. (car) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by Plaintiff Marquessa Margolin. (car) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Marquessa Margolin (car) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Case assigned to Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon.(Filing fee $402 PAID), filed by Plaintiff Marquessa Margolin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
