Elizabeth Thomas v. Doe et al
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Thomas
Defendant: Doe and BV Lakewood Carson SE LLC
Case Number: 2:2023cv00818
Filed: February 2, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Alexander F MacKinnon
Referring Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Rent Lease & Ejectment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court has reviewed the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (the "Request") and the documents submitted with it. On the On thequestion of indigency, the Court finds that the party who filed the Request is able to pay the filing fees. The Request is DENIED because the filer has the ability to pay. As explained in the attached statement, the Request is DENIED because: The District Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction; The action is frivolous or malicious; The actin fails to state a claim upoj which relief may be granted. As explained in the attached statement, because it is absolutely clear that the deficiencies in the complaint cannot be cured by amendment, this case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)
February 2, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE RE: DISCREPANCIES WITH FILING OF COMPLAINT OR NOTICE OF REMOVAL mailed to Plaintiff Elizabeth Thomas. Upon filing of your complaint, the following discrepancy was found: You have not submitted the entire filing fee amount of $ 402. If you are unable to pay the entire filing fee at this time, you may request that the fee be waived. To do so, you must complete, sign, and return the enclose form, Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60), in its entirety. If you do not respond within THIRTY DAYS from the date above, your action will be dismissed or remanded to state court, as appropriate. If your fee waiver request or payment is received within THIRTY DAYS, judges will be assigned to your case. You may return your fee waiver request or payment to any of the Courthouses listed on this notice. Re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 (sh)
February 2, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Doe, BV Lakewood Carson SE LLC.Case assigned to Judge Otis D. Wright, II for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon., filed by Plaintiff Elizabeth Thomas. (sh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Elizabeth Thomas v. Doe et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BV Lakewood Carson SE LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?