Jimmy Sharp v. The Walt Disney Company et al
Plaintiff: Jimmy Sharp
Defendant: THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Nissa Diederich, The Walt Disney Company and Does 1 thorugh 10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2023cv00820
Filed: February 2, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Stanley Blumenfeld
Referring Judge: Margo A Rocconi
2 Judge: Alka Sagar
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 25 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #20 filed by Plaintiff Jimmy Sharp. (Attachments: #1 Declaration JIMMY SHARP IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND, #2 Exhibit APPROVED LIST OF STUNT COORDINATORS, #3 Exhibit SAG-AFTRA PERFORMER'S TELEVSION CONTRACT, #4 Exhibit STAFF & CREW LIST)(Barrera, Patricio)
March 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 24 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 10-12 days, filed by Defendants Nissa Diederich, The Walt Disney Company.. (Luevano, Emma)
March 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 23 Opposition Opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #20 filed by Defendants Nissa Diederich, The Walt Disney Company. (Luevano, Emma)
March 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 22 DECLARATION of RYAN H. FOWLER NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #20 filed by Plaintiff Jimmy Sharp. (Barrera, Patricio)
March 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 21 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand at Dkt. No. #20 . In light of the nearly identical motion filed at Dkt. No. #9 , advanced by the Court, and subsequently withdrawn by Plaintiff, the Court ADVANCES the deadline for any opposition to this motion to March 27, 2023, and any reply is to be filed no later than March 31, 2023. Plaintiff is also ORDERED to file a declaration by March 24, 2023 explaining his reasoning for withdrawing and refiling the motion. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jgr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
March 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 20 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by PLAINTIFF Jimmy Sharp. Motion set for hearing on 4/21/2023 at 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr.. (Barrera, Patricio)
March 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT UPON RECUSAL by Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment Discovery pursuant to General Order 05-07. Case randomly reassigned from Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue to Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:23-cv00820 SB(MARx). (rn)
March 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 18 Notice of Withdrawal of Motion to Remand Case to State Court #9 filed by PLAINTIFF Jimmy Sharp. (Barrera, Patricio)
March 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 17 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The filer is directed to lodge the proposed document and a statement in compliance with LR 7-3 no later than March 6, 2023 in accordance with the Notice to Filer of Deficiencies at Dkt. No. #16 re: Dkt. No. #9 . (jgr)
March 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #9 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7-3 compliance statement missing. Proposed document was not submitted or was not submitted as a separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk)
March 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Pursuant to the reassignment of this matter, the Court ADVANCES the hearing date on Plaintiff's motion to remand to April 7, 2023 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 6C.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jgr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
March 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court sets an in-person Mandatory Scheduling Conference set for hearing on April 7, 2023 at 8:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. The parties shall file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report by March 28, 2023. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. (jgr)
March 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
March 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar to Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:23-cv-00820-SB (PDx). (et)
March 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #9 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or untimely. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (afe)
March 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by PLAINTIFF Jimmy Sharp, (Barrera, Patricio)
March 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by PLAINTIFF Jimmy Sharp. Motion set for hearing on 4/12/2023 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (Barrera, Patricio)
February 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (lh)
February 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Notice Defendants' Notice of Compliance re Removal filed by Defendants Nissa Diederich, THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation. (Luevano, Emma)
February 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Sandra Hanian counsel for Defendants Nissa Diederich, THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation. Adding Sandra Hanian as counsel of record for Defendants The Walt Disney Company and Nissa Diederich for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants The Walt Disney Company and Nissa Diederich. (Attorney Sandra Hanian added to party Nissa Diederich(pty:dft), Attorney Sandra Hanian added to party THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation(pty:dft))(Hanian, Sandra)
February 2, 2023 Opinion or Order CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Nissa Diederich, Does, The Walt Disney Company. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Jimmy Sharp. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 12/19/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
February 2, 2023 Opinion or Order NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Jimmy Sharp, upon Defendant Nissa Diederich acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 1/12/2023, answer due 2/2/2023. Acknowledgment of Service signed by Nissa Diederich, Counsel. (lh) (SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )
February 2, 2023 Opinion or Order CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant Nissa Diederich. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 2/1/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh)
February 2, 2023 Opinion or Order CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant The Walt Disney Company. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 2/01/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh)
February 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 DECLARATION of Marc L. Sandman re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Nissa Diederich, THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation. (Luevano, Emma)
February 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 DECLARATION of Emma Luevano re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Nissa Diederich, THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation. (Luevano, Emma)
February 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT and Certificate of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Nissa Diederich, THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation identifying The Walt Disney Company as Corporate Parent. (Luevano, Emma)
February 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Nissa Diederich, THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation. (Luevano, Emma)
February 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, case number 22STCV39275 Receipt No: ACACDC-34733959 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendants Nissa Diederich, THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation. (Attorney Emma Luevano added to party Nissa Diederich(pty:dft), Attorney Emma Luevano added to party THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation(pty:dft))(Luevano, Emma)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jimmy Sharp v. The Walt Disney Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jimmy Sharp
Represented By: Patricio T. Barrera
Represented By: Ryan H. Fowler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation
Represented By: Emma Luevano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nissa Diederich
Represented By: Emma Luevano
Represented By: Sandra Hanian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Walt Disney Company
Represented By: Sandra Hanian
Represented By: Emma Luevano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 thorugh 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?