Larry Dunn v. Edmond Hagooli, Inc. et al
Larry Dunn |
Edmond Hagooli, Inc. and Does 1 to 10 |
2:2023cv00904 |
February 7, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong |
Alka Sagar |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Larry Dunnto Order,,, #10 re: Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Edmond Hagooli, Inc. (ghap) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (ghap) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Larry Dunn. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Larry Dunn. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34752909 - Fee: $402. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party Larry Dunn(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.