Ronnie Lashan Winn v. J. Cappalla
| Ronnie Lashan Winn |
| J. Cappalla |
| 2:2023cv00986 |
| February 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Text Only Entry Service packet for Defendant emailed to the CDCR, USMS, and AG's Office. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ev) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights) #1 as to Defendant J. Cappalla. (es) |
Filing 6
ORDER RE SERVICE OF PROCESS UNDER THE CENTRAL DISTRICT E-SERVICE PILOT PROGRAM by Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi, re Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights) #1 See document for details. (es)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Granting #2 REQUEST to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee. It is further ORDERED that the prisoner-plaintiff owes the Court the initial filing fee of $350.00. An initial partial filing fee of $0 must be paid within 30 days of the date of this order. Thereafter, monthly payments shall be forwarded to the Court in accordance with this order. (gk)
|
| Filing 4 STATEMENT REPORT re REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support #2 filed by Plaintiff Ronnie Lashan Winn. (es) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (car) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Ronnie Lashan Winn. CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Mens Colony (CMC) in San Luis Obispo is DIRECTED to submit a certified Prison Trust Account Statement for Ronnie Lashan Winn P-82076 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account Statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified Prison Trust Account Statement in pdf format to PrisonerFilings_CACD@cacd.uscourts.gov with the case number and inmate name in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (car) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendant J. Cappalla pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Case assigned to Judge Andre Birotte Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi, filed by Plaintiff Ronnie Lashan Winn. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ronnie Lashan Winn v. J. Cappalla | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ronnie Lashan Winn | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: J. Cappalla | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
