Robert Serrano III et al v. Michael Ellis et al
| Robert Serrano III, Amado F. Suarez and Jose Luis Juarez |
| City of Pomona, Michael Ellis Police Chief, Garret M. Dulong Pomona Police Office, Does 1 through 25, inclusive, Police Chief Michael Ellis and Garret M. Dulong |
| 2:2023cv01016 |
| February 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen E Scott |
| John F Walter |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 26 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT All Defendants amending Complaint - (Discovery),, filed by Plaintiffs Jose Luis Juarez, Amado F. Suarez, Robert Serrano III(Contreras, Christian) |
| Filing 25 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Robert Serrano III, upon Defendant Garret M. Dulong served on 3/28/2023, answer due 5/30/2023. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Suarez, Francisco) |
Filing 24
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT CITY OF POMONA'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES [filed 2/23/2023; Docket No. #14 ] by Judge John F. Walter. Defendant City of Pomona's Motion to Dismiss the Eighth, Ninth, and Tenth Causes of Action is GRANTED. In the event Plaintiffs decide to pursue their Monell claim(s), Plaintiffs shall file their First Amended Complaint on or before April 6, 2023. (iv)
|
| Filing 23 NOTICE OF LODGING filed [PROPOSED] STATEMENT OF DECISION RE DEFENDANT CITY OF POMONAS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES #14 (Attachments: #1 [PROPOSED] STATEMENT OF DECISION RE DEFENDANT CITY OF POMONAS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES)(Redford, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 22
SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. The purpose of this Order is to notify the parties and their counsel of the deadlines and the schedule that will govern this action. Pretrial Conference set for 11/17/2023 at 8:00 AM. Hearing on Motions in Limine; Disputed Jury Instructions set for 12/1/2023 at 8:00 AM. Jury Trial set for 12/12/2023 at 8:30 AM. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (iv)
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, REFERRAL TO PRIVATE MEDIATION, and DISMISSING ANY UNSERVED DOE DEFENDANTS by Judge John F. Walter. The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report and finds that a Scheduling Conference is not necessary. The hearing on March 27, 2023 is vacated and taken off calendar. A Scheduling and Case Management Order will issue. Any unserved DOE defendants are dismissed at this time. The Court, having considered the parties Request: ADR Procedure Selection, the Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program, or the report submitted by the parties pursuant to Fed.R. Civ. P. 26(f) and Civil L.R. 26-1, hereby orders this case referred to: ADR Procedure No. 3: Private mediation. The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than: August 28, 2023. (iv)
|
| Filing 20 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES #14 filed by Defendant City of Pomona. (Redford, Jonathan) |
| Filing 19 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5-6 Days, filed by Plaintiffs Jose Luis Juarez, Robert Serrano III, Amado F. Suarez.. (Contreras, Christian) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Michael Ellis(in his official capacity), (Redford, Jonathan) |
| Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Michael Ellis(in his official capacity).(Attorney Jonathan D Redford added to party Michael Ellis(pty:dft))(Redford, Jonathan) |
| Filing 16 OPPOSITION re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES #14 filed by Plaintiffs Jose Luis Juarez, Robert Serrano III, Amado F. Suarez. (Contreras, Christian) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs, (Contreras, Christian) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES filed by Defendant City of Pomona. Motion set for hearing on 3/27/2023 at 01:30 PM before Judge John F. Walter. (Attachments: #1 Declaration OF JONATHAN D. REDFORD IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT CITY OF POMONAS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, #2 Exhibit A- meet and confer correspondence regarding Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint, #3 Proposed Order) (Redford, Jonathan) |
| Filing 13 STATEMENT JOINT STATEMENT REGARDING MEET AND CONFER ON DEFENDANT CITY OF POMONAS ANTICIPATED MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT filed by Defendant City of Pomona (Redford, Jonathan) |
| Filing 12 DECLARATION of LEAD TRIAL COUNSEL STEVEN J. ROTHANS filed by Defendant City of Pomona. (Rothans, Steven) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant City of Pomona, (Redford, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) COURT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for March 27, 2023 at 1:15 p.m. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before March 10, 2023. (iv)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
|
| Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ENTRY ORDER DISMISSING DOES: Pursuant to Local Rule 19-1, no complaint or petition shall be filed that includes more than ten Doe or fictitiously named parties. Accordingly, the Court hereby dismisses the action as to Doe Defendants 11 through 25, inclusive. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants City of Pomona, Does 1-25, inclusive, Garret M. Dulong, Michael Ellis(in his official capacity), Michael Ellis(in his individual capacity ). Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiffs Jose Luis Juarez, Amado F. Suarez, Robert Serrano III. Filed in State Court on 12/27/2022 Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant City of Pomona, served on February 10, 2023. (Redford, Jonathan) |
| Filing 3 Notice TO ADVERSE PARTY OF REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT filed by Defendant City of Pomona. (Redford, Jonathan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant City of Pomona. (Redford, Jonathan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 22PSCV03084 Receipt No: ACACDC-34777482 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant City of Pomona. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Summons) (Attorney Jonathan D Redford added to party City of Pomona(pty:dft))(Redford, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
