Kasey M. Dunton v. Walt Disney Parks and Resorts US, Inc. et al
Kasey M. Dunton |
Walt Disney Parks and Resorts US, Inc., Disney Parks, Experiences, and Products, The Walt Disney Company and DOES 1-100, inclusive |
2:2023cv01042 |
February 10, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Stanley Blumenfeld |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 RESPONSE filed by Defendant Walt Disney Parks and Resorts US, Inc.to Brief (non-motion non-appeal) #22 to Plaintiff's Memorandum of Points And Authorities Re: Applicability of Unruh Act to Discriminatory Acts Occurring Outside of California (Kwon, Ludia) |
Filing 23 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS DISNEY PARKS, EXPERIENCES, AND PRODUCTS, LLC AND THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Upon Stipulation #21 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) Defendant Disney Parks, Experiences, and Products, LLC sued herein as Disney Parks, Experiences and Products and The Walt Disney Company are dismissed from this action with prejudice, and each party shall bear its own attorney's fees, costs and expenses. (gk) |
Filing 22 MEMORANDUM of Points and Authorities Re Applicability of Unruh Act to Discriminatory Acts Occurring Outside of California Re: #17 filed by Plaintiff Kasey M. Dunton. (gk) |
Filing 21 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Defendants The Walt Disney Company, Disney Parks, Experiences, and Products filed by Defendants Walt Disney Parks and Resorts US, Inc., The Walt Disney Company, Disney Parks, Experiences, and Products. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kwon, Ludia) |
Filing 20 ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr) |
Filing 19 PRETRIAL AND TRIAL ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr) |
Filing 18 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The DOE defendants remaining after 5/12/2023 are dismissed by operation of this Order and without further notice. The Court has reviewed the Joint Rule 26(f) Report and sets the pretrial and trial dates noted in this order based on an evaluation of the complexity of the case. Bench Trial set for 10/30/2023 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. Final Pretrial Conference and Hearing on Motions in Limine set for 10/20/2023 10:00 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. Motion to Amend Pleadings/Add Parties (Hearing Deadline) 5/12/2023. Non-Expert Discovery cut-off 6/12/2023. Discovery Motion Hearing Deadline 7/3/2023. Non-Discovery Motion Hearing Deadline 7/28/2023. Settlement Conference Deadline 7/28/2023. Post-Settlement Status Conference set for 8/11/2023 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. Status Report due by 8/4/2023. Trial Filings (First Set) Deadline 9/22/2023. Trial Filings (Second Set) Deadline 10/6/2023. See document for further details. (gk) |
Filing 17 MINUTES OF Mandatory Scheduling Conference held before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court conferred with the parties on the contents of their Joint Rule 26(f) Report. The Court will issue a Case Management Order consistent with the discussion with counsel on the record. The parties shall exchange their initial disclosures by 3/17/2023. Also by March 17, Plaintiff shall file either (1) a brief, providing authority for Plaintiff's position that California's Unruh Act allows recovery of statutory damages for violations of the ADA in Florida or (2) a statement that Plaintiff seeks Unruh Act damages only for any violations that took place in California. If Plaintiff maintains the position that he is entitled to Unruh Act damages for violations in Florida, Defendants may file a responsive brief no later than March 24. Such briefs will be for the Court's benefit and will not be construed as a motion by Defendants. Court Reporter: Katie Thibodeaux. (gk) |
Filing 16 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court GRANTS Plaintiff Kasey Dunton's request to appear remotely for the Mandatory Scheduling Conference set for hearing on March 10, 2023. Dkt. No. #14 . Instructions for remote appearance can be found on Judge Blumenfeld's webpage. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jgr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 15 ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Jeremy M. White to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc., Disney Parks Experiences, and Products, and The Walt Disney Company, designating Ludia O. Kwon as local counsel #13 . (gk) |
Filing 14 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 2-3 days, filed by Defendants Disney Parks, Experiences, and Products, The Walt Disney Company, Walt Disney Parks and Resorts US, Inc... (Kwon, Ludia) |
Filing 13 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jeremy M. White to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants Disney Parks, Experiences, and Products, The Walt Disney Company, Walt Disney Parks and Resorts US, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34828468) filed by Defendants Disney Parks, Experiences, and Products, The Walt Disney Company, Walt Disney Parks and Resorts US, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Supreme Court of Maryland Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit B - District of Columbia Bar Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Proof o Service) (Kwon, Ludia) |
Filing 12 Notice of Compliance with 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1446 filed by Defendants Disney Parks, Experiences, and Products, The Walt Disney Company, Walt Disney Parks and Resorts US, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Kwon, Ludia) |
Filing 11 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED ("PRO SE")LITIGANT by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Although Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, i.e., without legal representation, you are nonetheless required to comply with Court orders, the Local Rules, and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See C.D. Cal. L.R. 83-2.2.3. The Local Rules are available on this Court's website. There is a free "Pro Se Clinic" that can provide information and guidance about many aspects of civil litigation in this Court. The Clinic is located at the Roybal Federal Building and Courthouse, 255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Pro se litigants must call or submit an on-line application to request services as follows: on-line applications can be submitted at http://prose.cacd.uscourts.gov/los-angeles, or call (213) 385-2977, ext. 270. Pro se litigants may submit documents for filing through the Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) instead of mailing or bringing documents to the Clerk's Office. Only internet access and an e-mail address are required. To access EDSS and for additional information, visit the Court's website at https://apps.cacd.uscourts.gov/edss. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jgr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 10 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court sets an in-person Mandatory Scheduling Conference set for hearing on March 10, 2023 at 8:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. The parties shall file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report by February 28, 2023. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. (jgr) |
Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 8 CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (jtil) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Kasey M. Dunton in Los Angeles Superior Court on 11/9/2022, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Walt Disney Parks and Resorts US, Inc. in Los Angeles Superior Court on 2/9/2023, attached as Exhibit E. (jtil) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Disney Parks, Experiences, and Products in Los Angeles Superior Court 2/9/2023, attached as Exhibit F. (jtil) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant The Walt Disney Company in Los Angeles Superior Court on 2/9/2023, attached as Exhibit G. (jtil) |
Filing 5 Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc.'s CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Walt Disney Parks and Resorts US, Inc., identifying The Walt Disney Company (Corporate Parent). (Kwon, Ludia) |
Filing 4 The Walt Disney Company's CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants The Walt Disney Company, (Kwon, Ludia) |
Filing 3 Disney Parks, Experiences, and Products' CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Disney Parks, Experiences, and Products, identifying The Walt Disney Company (Corporate Parent). (Kwon, Ludia) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Disney Parks, Experiences, and Products, The Walt Disney Company, Walt Disney Parks and Resorts US, Inc.. (Kwon, Ludia) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 22BBCV00967 Receipt No: ACACDC-34781957 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendants Walt Disney Parks and Resorts US, Inc., The Walt Disney Company, Disney Parks, Experiences, and Products. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-H to Notice of Removal, #2 Proof of Service) (Attorney Ludia Kwon added to party Disney Parks, Experiences, and Products(pty:dft), Attorney Ludia Kwon added to party The Walt Disney Company(pty:dft), Attorney Ludia Kwon added to party Walt Disney Parks and Resorts US, Inc.(pty:dft))(Kwon, Ludia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.