Zhanyun Ma v. David Radel et al
| Zhanyun Ma |
| David Radel, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas and United States Department of Justice |
| 2:2023cv01092 |
| February 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Sheri Pym |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(i) filed by petitioner Zhanyun Ma. (jp) |
| Filing 6 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (vv) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Petitioner Zhanyun Ma. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Petitioner Zhanyun Ma. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS filed by Petitioner Zhanyun Ma against Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, David Radel, United States Department of Justice. (Attachments: #1 CV71, #2 Summons Request) (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
