E and E Co., Ltd. v. Metropolitan International Corp. et al
| E and E Co., Ltd. |
| Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| E & E Co., Ltd. and Metropolitan International Corp. |
| 2:2023cv01174 |
| February 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Stipulation Extending Time to Answer #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed document was not submitted or was not submitted as a separate attachment. Other error(s) with document(s): No [Prop] Order attached. Requested time is more than 30 days. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lom) |
| Filing 12 Twelfth STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Parties, filed by Defendant Metropolitan International Corp..(Attorney Bin Li added to party Metropolitan International Corp.(pty:dft))(Li, Bin) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff E and E Co., Ltd., upon Defendant Metropolitan International Corp. served on 3/2/2023, answer due 3/23/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Ken Tan, Agent for Service in compliance with statute not specified by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Ellison, Michael) |
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Metropolitan International Corp. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff E & E Co., Ltd., identifying E & E Co., LTD. (Ellison, Michael) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by E & E Co., Ltd.. (Ellison, Michael) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant E & E Co., Ltd.. (Ellison, Michael) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff E & E Co., Ltd.. (Ellison, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34808748 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff E & E Co., Ltd.. (Attorney Michael W Ellison added to party E & E Co., Ltd.(pty:bkmov))(Ellison, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
