Andre Nesbit v. Dominos Pizzas LLC et al
| Andre Nesbit |
| Dominos Pizzas LLC, Jon Doe and Somerset County Courthouse |
| 2:2023cv01280 |
| February 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Otis D Wright |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: As explained in the attached statement, the Request is DENIED because: The District Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. The action is frivolous or malicious. The action fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. As explained in the attached statement, because it is absolutely clear that the deficiencies in the complaint cannot be cured by amendment, this case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE #2 , #3 . MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (lc)
|
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Andre Nesbit, re REQUEST to Produce DOCUMENTS AND PERMIT INSPECTION AND COPYING OF DOCUMENTS #8 , REQUEST to Produce #7 served on on or by 03/1/2023. (hr) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER STRIKING FILED DOCUMENTS FROM THE RECORD by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. The documents listed below were improperly filed for the following reasons: Discovery requests are premature as plaintiff's IFP request is pending, no defendant has been served/appeared & per Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(d), no party may seek discovery at this juncture; and in any event, discovery is to be conducted between the parties and should not be filed unless there is a proceeding in which the discovery is in issue/disputed per L.R. 26-2; therefore, the following document(s) shall be stricken from the record and shall not be considered by the Court: REQUEST to Produce DOCUMENTS AND PERMIT INSPECTION AND COPYING OF DOCUMENTS #8 , REQUEST to Produce #7 . (hr)
|
| Filing 8 ***STRICKEN PER ORDER #9 *** REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY FOR DEFENDANT SOMERSET COUNTY COURTHOUSE RE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS (SEE DOCUMENT FOR LIST) filed by plaintiff Andre Nesbit.(lc) Modified on 2/28/2023 (lc). Modified on 3/1/2023 (hr). |
| Filing 7 ***STRICKEN PER ORDER #9 *** REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY FOR DEFENDANT DOMINO'S PIZZA LLC RE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS (SEE DOCUMENT FOR LIST) filed by plaintiff Andre Nesbit.(lc) Modified on 2/28/2023 (lc). Modified on 3/1/2023 (hr). |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (lh) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by Plaintiff Andre Nesbit. (lh) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Andre Nesbit. (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Jon Doe, Dominos Pizzas LLC, Somerset County Courthouse.Case assigned to Judge Otis D. Wright, II for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Jacquiline Chooljian. Filed by Plaintiff Andre Nesbit. (Attachments: #1 Summons Request, #2 Summons Request, #3 Summons Request, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
