David Deloza v. Arun Chakrabarry et al
Plaintiff: David Deloza
Defendant: Dr. Arun Chakrabarry, Dr. M. Soleinmi, Mr. S. Gates and S. Gates
Case Number: 2:2023cv01316
Filed: February 21, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dale S Fischer
Referring Judge: Alexander F MacKinnon
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer DISMISSING Action for Failing to Pay Filing Fee and Comply with the Court Orders. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) See Order for specifics. (jp)
March 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer that the REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support #2 is POSTENED for 30 days. FURTHER ORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff must do the following: (1) Refile a fully completed, signed, and dated CV-60P on the Court's updated form, accompanying this Order; OR (2) Pay the full filing fee of $402. (jp)
February 28, 2023 Filing 5 STATEMENT INMATE STATEMENT REPORT filed by Plaintiff David Deloza re: #2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support (es)
February 24, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (car)
February 22, 2023 Filing 3 Notice of Deficiency. On 2/21/2023, the Court received, through the United States Mail, a complaint arising under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Please be advised that the Court and California State Prison, Los Angeles County (LAC) are participants in a pilot project that requires all such documents to be scanned and submitted to the Court by electronic mail, General Order No. 18-02. Submission of this complaint by U.S. Mail violates the terms of General Order 18-02. To submit a complaint arising under 42 U.S.C. 1983 to the Court for filing, you must present it to designated LAC staff for scanning and emailing to the Court. If you are unable to comply with these procedures, you must submit with your complaint a motion for leave to file your documents by U.S. Mail that demonstrates good cause for your inability to submit your documents to the Court electronically. You must now re-submit your complaint to the Court electronically. You must submit for scanning an exact copy of the complaint you previously mailed to the Court; it cannot be modified in any way. You must include this notice on top of the complaint submitted for scanning. If your complaint is received in the Court's electronic mail box within two weeks from the date of this letter, your complaint will be deemed filed as of the date that appears on the envelope you originally sent via U.S. Mail. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (car)
February 21, 2023 Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff David Deloza. CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California State Prison, Los Angeles County (LAC) in Lancaster is DIRECTED to submit a certified Prison Trust Account Statement for David Deloza D-89521 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account Statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified Prison Trust Account Statement in pdf format to PrisonerFilings_CACD@cacd.uscourts.gov with the case number and inmate name in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (car)
February 21, 2023 Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Case assigned to Judge Dale S. Fischer and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon, filed by Plaintiff David Deloza. (car)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: David Deloza v. Arun Chakrabarry et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Deloza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. Arun Chakrabarry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. M. Soleinmi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mr. S. Gates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S. Gates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?