Rohith Gangireddigari et al v. Ur Jaddou et al
| Rohith GANGIREDDIGARI and Dedeepya CHINTAPARTHI |
| Ur JADDOU and Kristine CRANDALL |
| 2:2023cv01442 |
| February 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Christina A Snyder |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Dedeepya Chintaparthi, Rohith Gangireddigari. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Patel, Niralkumar) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO COUNSEL upon filing of the complaint by Judge Christina A. Snyder. (rba) |
| Filing 11 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Kristine Crandall, Ur Jaddou. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued- Kristine Crandall)(rolm) |
| Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Dedeepya Chintaparthi, Rohith Gangireddigari. (Patel, Niralkumar) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Complaint #1 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write "see attached." Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (gk) |
| Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Dedeepya Chintaparthi, Rohith Gangireddigari. (Patel, Niralkumar) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #4 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. missing the attachment to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (et) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Dedeepya CHINTAPARTHI, Rohith GANGIREDDIGARI. (Patel, Niralkumar) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, (Patel, Niralkumar) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Dedeepya CHINTAPARTHI, Rohith GANGIREDDIGARI. (Patel, Niralkumar) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($402 paid on 02/26/2023, receipt number 34856466), filed by Plaintiffs Rohith GANGIREDDIGARI, Dedeepya CHINTAPARTHI. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit AOS Receipt Notices) (Attorney Niralkumar Patel added to party Dedeepya CHINTAPARTHI(pty:pla), Attorney Niralkumar Patel added to party Rohith GANGIREDDIGARI(pty:pla))(Patel, Niralkumar) |
| FILING FEE PAID for new civil case. Receipt No. ACACDC-34856466 for $402 filing fee. (Patel, Niralkumar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
