Raya Torossian v. 1-800-Pack-Rat, LLC et al
| Raya Torossian |
| 1-800-PACK-RAT, LLC, DOES 1 - 10 and Does 1-10 |
| 2:2023cv01453 |
| February 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Defendant's Miscellaneous Document #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Non-Opposition to Motion. Other error(s) with document(s): Note: To assist in a search for correct events, please use the "SEARCH" option for a "key word" to narrow the selection process. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 13 Notice of Non-Opposition to Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant 1-800-Pack-Rat, LLC (Hughes, Bradford) |
Filing 12
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Scheduling Conference set for 6/9/2023 at 01:00 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(B)(6) filed by Defendant 1-800-Pack-Rat, LLC. Motion set for hearing on 5/5/2023 at 01:30 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Regarding Defendant's Motion to Dismiss) (Hughes, Bradford) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to 1-800-Pack-Rat, LLC answer now due 4/6/2023, filed by Defendant 1-800-Pack-Rat, LLC.(Hughes, Bradford) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant 1-800-Pack-Rat, LLC, re Notice of Assignment; Notice re Consent to Proceed Before us Magistrate Judge; and Notice of Initial Standing Order served on March 1, 2023. (Hughes, Bradford) |
|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants 1-800-Pack-Rat, LLC, Does 1-10., filed by plaintiff Raya Torossian. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/8/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1) (ghap) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant 1-800-PACK-RAT, LLC. (Hughes, Bradford) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant 1-800-PACK-RAT, LLC (Hughes, Bradford) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant 1-800-PACK-RAT, LLC, (Hughes, Bradford) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County, case number 22STCV25483 Receipt No: ACACDC-34859271 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant 1-800-PACK-RAT, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Seta Sarabekian, Esq. in support of Petition of Removal) (Attorney Bradford G Hughes added to party 1-800-PACK-RAT, LLC(pty:dft))(Hughes, Bradford) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
