Maria Santos v. Bleusalt LLC
| Maria Santos |
| Bleusalt LLC |
| 2:2023cv01472 |
| February 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| John F Walter |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. The purpose of this Order is to notify the parties and their counsel of the deadlines and the schedule that will govern this action. Hearing on Motions in Limine; Disputed Jury Instructions set for 4/5/2024 at 8:00 AM. Pretrial Conference set for 3/29/2024 at 8:00 AM. Jury Trial set for 4/16/2024 at 8:30 AM. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (iv)
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, REFERRAL TO PRIVATE MEDIATION, and DISMISSING ANY UNSERVED DOE DEFENDANTS by Judge John F. Walter. The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report and finds that a Scheduling Conference is not necessary. The hearing on May 8, 2023 is vacated and taken off calendar. A Scheduling and Case Management Order will issue. Any unserved DOE defendants are dismissed at this time. The Court, having considered the parties Request: ADR Procedure Selection, the Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program, or the report submitted by the parties pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and Civil L.R. 26-1, hereby orders this case referred to: ADR Procedure No. 3: Private mediation. The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than: December 18, 2023. (iv)
|
| Filing 20 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 2 to 5 days, filed by Defendant Bleusalt LLC.. (Moralyan, Emma) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Bleusalt LLC, identifying none. (Moralyan, Emma) |
| Filing 18 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 and Affirmative Defenses filed by Defendant Bleusalt LLC.(Moralyan, Emma) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER DENYING SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND JOINT REPORT #16 by Judge John F. Walter. (lom)
|
| Filing 16 Second STIPULATION to Continue Responsive Pleading and Scheduling Conference from April 21 and May 8, 2023 to May 22 and TBD, 2023 Re: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only,, #15 filed by Defendant Bleusalt LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Moralyan, Emma) |
|
Filing 15
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) COURT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for May 8, 2023 at 1:15 p.m. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before April 21, 2023. (iv)
|
|
Filing 14
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi to Judge John F. Walter for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:23-cv-01472 JFW(PVCx). (rn) |
| Filing 12 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Defendant Bleusalt LLC. (Attorney Emma Moralyan added to party Bleusalt LLC(pty:dft))(Moralyan, Emma) |
| Filing 11 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (vam) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Bleusalt LLC answer now due 4/21/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Bleusalt LLC.(Attorney Ramnik Singh Pujji added to party Bleusalt LLC(pty:dft))(Pujji, Ramnik) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Maria Santos, upon Defendant Bleusalt LLC served on 3/1/2023, answer due 3/22/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon SIULAN KANTER, CLERK in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Harrison, Michael) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Bleusalt LLC. (es) |
| Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons,, #6 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Maria Santos. (Harrison, Michael) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #4 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (Attachments: #1 CV11C Statement of Consent) (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Maria Santos. (Harrison, Michael) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Maria Santos, (Harrison, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Maria Santos. (Harrison, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34865058 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Maria Santos. (Attorney Michael Todd Harrison added to party Maria Santos(pty:pla))(Harrison, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Maria Santos v. Bleusalt LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Maria Santos | |
| Represented By: | Michael Todd Harrison |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bleusalt LLC | |
| Represented By: | Emma Moralyan |
| Represented By: | Ramnik Singh Pujji |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
