Roua Saif et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
Roua Saif and George Hakoum |
United States Department of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, Los Angeles Asylum Office, David Radel, SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director UR M JADDOU, Ted H Kim, Matthew D. Emrich, Christopher A. Wray, Alejandro Mayorkas and Ur M Jaddou |
2:2023cv01502 |
February 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alka Sagar |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 44 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (hr) |
Filing 43 AMENDED PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff George Hakoum, Roua Saif, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) Modified on 3/14/2023 (hr). |
Filing 42 AMENDED PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff George Hakoum, Roua Saif, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) Modified on 3/14/2023 (hr). |
Filing 41 AMENDED PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff George Hakoum, Roua Saif, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) Modified on 3/14/2023 (hr). |
Filing 40 AMENDED PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff George Hakoum, Roua Saif, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) Modified on 3/14/2023 (hr). |
Filing 39 AMENDED PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff George Hakoum, Roua Saif, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) Modified on 3/14/2023 (hr). |
Filing 38 AMENDED PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff George Hakoum, Roua Saif, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) Modified on 3/14/2023 (hr). |
Filing 37 AMENDED PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff George Hakoum, Roua Saif, upon Defendant Ur M Jaddou served on 3/6/2023, answer due 5/5/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) Modified on 3/14/2023 (hr). |
Filing 36 AMENDED PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff George Hakoum, Roua Saif, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) Modified on 3/14/2023 (hr). |
Filing 35 AMENDED PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff George Hakoum, Roua Saif, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) Modified on 3/14/2023 (hr). |
Filing 34 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: Proofs of Service #24 , #25 , #26 , #27 , #28 , #29 , #30 , #31 , #32 ; Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) #33 by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. The document is stricken. Counsel is directed to file AMENDED Proofs of Service that cures the deficiency listed on docket no. 33. For assistance in properly e-filing documents, counsel shall contact the Help Desk at (213) 894-0242 or ecf-helpdesk@cacd.uscourts.gov (hr) |
Filing 33 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Filed Document RE: Proofs of Service #24 , #25 , #26 , #27 , #28 , #29 , #30 , #31 , #32 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 11-3.8 title page is missing. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (hr) |
Filing 32 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff George Hakoum, Roua Saif, upon Defendant Christopher A. Wray served on 3/6/2023, answer due 5/5/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 31 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff George Hakoum, Roua Saif, upon Defendant United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 3/6/2023, answer due 5/5/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 30 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff George Hakoum, Roua Saif, upon Defendant David Radel served on 3/6/2023, answer due 5/5/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 29 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff George Hakoum, Roua Saif, upon Defendant Los Angeles Asylum Office served on 3/6/2023, answer due 5/5/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 28 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff George Hakoum, Roua Saif, upon Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas served on 3/6/2023, answer due 5/5/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 27 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff George Hakoum, Roua Saif, upon Defendant Ted H Kim served on 3/6/2023, answer due 5/5/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 26 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff George Hakoum, Roua Saif, upon Defendant Ur M Jaddou served on 3/2/2023, answer due 5/1/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 25 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff George Hakoum, Roua Saif, upon Defendant Matthew D. Emrich served on 3/6/2023, answer due 5/5/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 24 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff George Hakoum, Roua Saif, upon Defendant United States Department of Homeland Security served on 3/6/2023, answer due 5/5/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 23 MINUTE (In Chambers) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar under the Civil Consent Pilot Project. The parties are reminded to review the time requirements for consent set forth in the Notice to Counsel that was issued at the time of the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff is instructed to forthwith serve a copy of this Order on all parties that have already been served with the summons and complaint, or to serve all parties with a copy of this Order at the time of service of the summons and complaint. (et) |
Filing 22 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Christopher A. Wray. (et) |
Filing 21 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Matthew D. Emrich. (et) |
Filing 20 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Ted H Kim. (et) |
Filing 19 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Ur M Jaddou. (et) |
Filing 18 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas. (et) |
Filing 17 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant David Radel. (et) |
Filing 16 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Los Angeles Asylum Office. (et) |
Filing 15 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (et) |
Filing 14 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant United States Department of Homeland Security. (et) |
Filing 13 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (Attachments: #1 CV11C Statement of Consent) (et) |
Filing 12 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff George Hakoum, Roua Saif. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff George Hakoum, Roua Saif. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff George Hakoum, Roua Saif. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff George Hakoum, Roua Saif. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff George Hakoum, Roua Saif. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff George Hakoum, Roua Saif. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff George Hakoum, Roua Saif. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff George Hakoum, Roua Saif. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff George Hakoum, Roua Saif. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff George Hakoum, Roua Saif, (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs George Hakoum, Roua Saif. (Khatib, Salah) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34871069 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff George Hakoum, Roua Saif. (Attorney Salah O. Khatib added to party George Hakoum (pty:pla), Attorney Salah O. Khatib added to party Roua Saif (pty:pla))(Khatib, Salah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.